Jason Hammel
#141
Posted 30 May 2012 - 10:59 PM
I look to trade both JJs, Lindstrom, Gregg, Reynolds and Betimet.
#142
Posted 30 May 2012 - 11:50 PM
The only way I'd definitely keep him is if they are realistically competing next year anyway.
#143
Posted 31 May 2012 - 02:28 AM
Is there a policy about having just one mega-thread per guy and everything about him gets funneled into it? Seems pretty weird to me, but I guess there's a reason for it. Dunno what it is though. Maybe it's a reaction to how things work at another place that always has umpteen threads that started within 30 minutes of each other, all demanding that the team punish anybody who has a bad night or two?
I'm mainly just curious... although it is kind of a drag to have to go hunting around to find the starting place for recent posts about anybody... (NBFD, just my 2 cents, that's all...)
- Pedro Cerrano likes this
"The only change is that baseball has turned Paige from a second-class citizen to a second-class immortal." - Satchel Paige
#144
Posted 31 May 2012 - 07:38 AM
I clicked on this thread, expecting to see comments about how the guy did tonight... and I find myself reading stuff that doesn't make any sense... and then I see it's a thread from ~2 months ago. Huh?
Is there a policy about having just one mega-thread per guy and everything about him gets funneled into it? Seems pretty weird to me, but I guess there's a reason for it. Dunno what it is though. Maybe it's a reaction to how things work at another place that always has umpteen threads that started within 30 minutes of each other, all demanding that the team punish anybody who has a bad night or two?
I'm mainly just curious... although it is kind of a drag to have to go hunting around to find the starting place for recent posts about anybody... (NBFD, just my 2 cents, that's all...)
There is a thread (now locked) in the Introduction section, 'Something that bugs me,' which provides background on this. Others have shared your sentiment, so we will make an adjustment.
#146
Posted 31 May 2012 - 09:20 AM
http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/blog/bal-orioles-starter-jason-hammel-jays-took-strong-swings-on-breaking-balls-like-they-knew-they-were-coming-20120530,0,3125471.story
From that article:
“When you’re locating your fastball, youre going to give up some home runs there, but the swings they were taking on he breaking stuff, it was pretty amazing to me,” Hammel said. “I don’t think you can take swings like that not knowing they’re coming. I don’t know. That’s all I can say.
“There’s rumors and things like that,” he said. “I don’t know. I can’t speak on that, but they were taking very, very big strong hacks on breaking stuff.
“It was something I’ve never seen before.”
The Jays are sporting a .803 OPS at home vs. a .660 OPS on the road, FWIW.
#147
Posted 31 May 2012 - 09:31 AM
No worries at all though. Knee appeared to be a lot better and his stuff was still very good. Just had an off night with command which isn't that surprising since he is probably spending more off time working on his knee in comparison to working on his delivery, stuff, etc....
#148
Posted 31 May 2012 - 09:38 AM
Doesn't matter...Hammel was off with his fb command last night. That's why he "struggled".
No worries at all though. Knee appeared to be a lot better and his stuff was still very good. Just had an off night with command which isn't that surprising since he is probably spending more off time working on his knee in comparison to working on his delivery, stuff, etc....
His knee could be WHY his command was off. The landing and your release happen right about the same time, if he was worried about the knee or trying to favor it, it could have been throwing off his release point, which would mess up his command.
#149
Posted 31 May 2012 - 09:40 AM
Yea, certainly possible.Doesn't matter...Hammel was off with his fb command last night. That's why he "struggled".
No worries at all though. Knee appeared to be a lot better and his stuff was still very good. Just had an off night with command which isn't that surprising since he is probably spending more off time working on his knee in comparison to working on his delivery, stuff, etc....
His knee could be WHY his command was off. The landing and your release happen right about the same time, if he was worried about the knee or trying to favor it, it could have been throwing off his release point, which would mess up his command.
#150
Posted 31 May 2012 - 10:01 AM
Doesn't matter...Hammel was off with his fb command last night. That's why he "struggled".
No worries at all though. Knee appeared to be a lot better and his stuff was still very good. Just had an off night with command which isn't that surprising since he is probably spending more off time working on his knee in comparison to working on his delivery, stuff, etc....
I agree. I actually would have preferred he not go there with the media. If he felt something suspicious was up, he should have let Buck escalate it through the appropriate channels. It doesn't look right when you're using that an excuse with the media. Dare I say, it's Girardi'esque.
#151
Posted 31 May 2012 - 10:04 AM
Well that depends on how real the "new" Hammel and his 2-seamer are. He has been dynamite with it early in the year and I totally agree that if it's legitimately changed his repertoire that much, then he's better than a #3.He is better than a #3.
Even if he regresses a bit, 2 years of him is absolutely worth one year of Jeremy Guthrie, though. And Lindstrom is a great throw in. For a trade nobody was excited about, it's worked out quite well so far.
#152
Posted 31 May 2012 - 06:26 PM
#153
Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:35 AM
For the year, Hammel is 6-2, with a 3.06 era. In his 61.2 ip, he has allowed 54 hits, 7 hr's, 19 bb's, with 58 k's. His OPS against is .673, and his G/F is 1.18.
#154
Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:51 AM
#155
Posted 05 June 2012 - 09:39 AM
#156
Posted 05 June 2012 - 09:41 AM
Yea, I saw Adair kind of hint that the issue was flaring up again.Has anyone heard how his knee is doing? It improved after it was drained and we got one good start followed by one ok start (alleged sign stealing aside). After his last start, there was some scuttle that his knee regressed, but nobody can/will officially comment on it. Does anyone have any insight?
They need to DL him if he can't get through it.
I imagine tonight's start will tell the story.
#157
Posted 05 June 2012 - 09:51 AM
The Sox are likely again without Pedroia but they're playing good baseball. If Hammel is still bothered by the knee they're gonna have to DL him and he can join the rest of the team in the hospital ward.
There is baseball, and occasionally there are other things of note
"Now OPS sucks. Got it."
"Making his own olive brine is peak Mackus."
"I'm too hungover to watch a loss." - McNulty
@bopper33
#158
Posted 05 June 2012 - 10:19 AM
I don't think it was a complete fluke at all, as you noted Tor OPSes much higher at home. For it to be a fluke, it would have to happen out of nowhere.Last start was a complete fluke IMO. 4 solo HRs to a team that OPSes that much higher at home leaves my head scratching.
The Sox are likely again without Pedroia but they're playing good baseball. If Hammel is still bothered by the knee they're gonna have to DL him and he can join the rest of the team in the hospital ward.
#159
Posted 10 June 2012 - 11:39 AM
#160
Posted 10 June 2012 - 08:10 PM
Hammel on the mound today. In Toronto he let up 4 homers. In Boston, he needed 106 pitches to get through 5 innings. Lots of deep counts. I want to see him pound the strike zone, and get ahead. Force the Phillies to swing, and eat up their bats with the 2 seamer.
Didn't happen but nice job giving the team some clean innings after the horrendous start to the game.
Well I hear Linda Ronstadt is looking for a guitar player.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users