Haha. At what point do you think Andino had more value than a PTBNL?Should've traded him in the offseason or after his hot start. Hes been pretty awful since May/June.
He has been hitting horrible since May, no doubt about that.
Posted 15 August 2012 - 12:48 PM
Haha. At what point do you think Andino had more value than a PTBNL?Should've traded him in the offseason or after his hot start. Hes been pretty awful since May/June.
Posted 15 August 2012 - 01:11 PM
Haha. At what point do you think Andino had more value than a PTBNL?
He has been hitting horrible since May, no doubt about that.
Posted 15 August 2012 - 01:32 PM
Who would you have liked to see internally as B-Rob insurance and Opening Day starter at 2nd? Or externally, who would you have suggested come in and at what cost?I remember hearing that he was getting alot of interest over the offseason. Maybe that wasn't the case but if we could've gotten a mid level prospect or two I would've taken it. I was never sold on Andino despite his late season heroics last season. I'll always be grateful for what he did in game 162 but he doesn't provide much other than solid defense. Not bad as a bench player, not good as a starter.
Posted 15 August 2012 - 04:29 PM
Posted 16 August 2012 - 09:05 AM
Who would you have liked to see internally as B-Rob insurance and Opening Day starter at 2nd? Or externally, who would you have suggested come in and at what cost?
"We're not going to be f***ing suck this year" - Alex Ovechkin
@BaltimoreDavey
Posted 16 September 2012 - 06:27 PM
Posted 16 September 2012 - 06:38 PM
True... but Buck has apparently decided that he's the most nugget-like of his various 2B options... the other guys are mainly keeping the dugout crowded...Andino was 2 for 4 with an RBI, and a sacrifice today.
As I've said previously in this thread, I think he is better than he has shown this year, but what a brutal year overall.
"You say you've lost your faith, but that's not where its at.
You have no faith to lose, and ya know it" - Bob Dylan
Posted 16 September 2012 - 06:41 PM
Yep..but that's not saying much judging by the second base competition.True... but Buck has apparently decided that he's the most nugget-like of his various 2B options... the other guys are mainly keeping the dugout crowded...
Posted 16 September 2012 - 06:42 PM
I'm guessing they already made it... not that they have any reason to tell us...Yep..but that's not saying much judging by the second base competition.
The BROb decision this offseason needs to be made quickly.
"You say you've lost your faith, but that's not where its at.
You have no faith to lose, and ya know it" - Bob Dylan
Posted 16 September 2012 - 06:45 PM
I doubt it...gotta see how he is doing.I'm guessing they already made it... not that they have any reason to tell us...
Posted 16 September 2012 - 06:51 PM
Well, if so, that's a decision...I doubt it...gotta see how he is doing.
"You say you've lost your faith, but that's not where its at.
You have no faith to lose, and ya know it" - Bob Dylan
Posted 17 September 2012 - 10:24 AM
That's why I think he'll be back atleast roster and payroll wise. Doesn't mean you can't go out and get someone else and if somehow B-Rob works out, it's a good problem to have!I doubt it...gotta see how he is doing.
Can't see bringing him back personally but you owe him 10 million...that's a lot of money to eat and I doubt he retires or takes a buyout.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |