Don't compare a fresh draft pick to people on the existing top 100 in any way. This is just a general way to say, as of right now, with zero development, this is the range of players we think he is in at the moment. You can't for a second compare him to guys with years of pro development, and the top 100 really means absolutely nothing. It's only meant for people who loosely follow prospects to have some sort of frame of reference. How many guys, even top 10 prospects end up being busts? A TON of them.
Ya'll need to ignore these "rankings" and let the kid play a while. I know it's hard for some of you, but you can NOT tell what you have with a guy right away, give him a few years and see how things turn out before you try to play MMQB.
I understand what you're saying, but 'these guys' usually get the benefit of the doubt in their ranking.
Initial perceptions matter. People see what they want to. There's a reason that Forrest Whitely still have a ranking despite being terrible...but Grayson Rodriguez has to pitch his ass off over and over to get consideration in the rankings. I mean seriously, if you were offered Whitely for GRod, would you do it? Mark Appel was terrible and held onto his top100 ranking until he forced his way off it.
Talent rankings are a measure of comparative talent it is 100% disappointing that he's not valued more to start because normally they dream on unproven guys.
He'll still get a chance to do whatever he can. He will 100% be given every opportunity to make them look good and that's fine. We'll see what he does.