I agree that both are probably non-tendered, unless something drastic changes. 10M+ for each next year doesn't seem likely. So getting something instead of nothing is appealing.
So the real question is, on a team with real WS aspirations, is losing whatever they give you in 2024 worth whatever you get in a trade? Depends on what they give you in a trade I guess. What market is there for "guys with a track record as major leaguers who suddenly look terrible as they get to 29-30 years old." I am with Mackus that I think these guys are still potentially pretty useful to this team, so I need a good bit more than "better than getting nothing later."
I'm curious to know what "something of a drug deal" with Fabian means but maybe I'll regret asking I don't know.