Do they mean swing and miss % when they say whiff %?
Probably just K%, I'm sure they aren't going that far into things.
Posted 21 April 2013 - 12:45 PM
Do they mean swing and miss % when they say whiff %?
Probably just K%, I'm sure they aren't going that far into things.
Posted 21 April 2013 - 12:46 PM
Do they mean swing and miss % when they say whiff %?
Yes.
Posted 21 April 2013 - 12:46 PM
Nice start... go pound this kid and get some runs right away.
Posted 21 April 2013 - 12:46 PM
Good inning by Jake.
Let's get the lead early against this guy.
Posted 21 April 2013 - 12:46 PM
Probably just K%, I'm sure they aren't going that far into things.
Nah, it's swing and miss... Hunter cited that stat earlier - graphic said "whiff", but he verbally said, "whiff, or swing and miss % for Jake".
Posted 21 April 2013 - 12:50 PM
I'm very impressed that my dog is enjoying the few ounces of Natty Boh I gave her. Her face after the first sip was priceless though.
Posted 21 April 2013 - 12:52 PM
I'm very impressed that my dog is enjoying the few ounces of Natty Boh I gave her. Her face after the first sip was priceless though.
This water tastes odd.
Posted 21 April 2013 - 12:52 PM
Machado called out on the appeal. 1 down. Tough call.
Posted 21 April 2013 - 12:55 PM
Do you ever feel like on those appeal calls, when the batter takes it upon himself to head to first, that the ump rings him up on spite? Just as if to say "I'm making the calls around here pal."
Posted 21 April 2013 - 12:56 PM
Do you ever feel like on those appeal calls, when the batter takes it upon himself to head to first, that the ump rings him up on spite? Just as if to say "I'm making the calls around here pal."
On close ball 4s where the player goes to 1st without a call from the home ump, 95% of the time the ump seems to call a strike.
Posted 21 April 2013 - 12:56 PM
Do you ever feel like on those appeal calls, when the batter takes it upon himself to head to first, that the ump rings him up on spite? Just as if to say "I'm making the calls around here pal."
Posted 21 April 2013 - 12:57 PM
The best thing that could happen is that Jake dominates today, and the O's trade him tomorrow. :/
Just can't say he's ever going to be more than an up and down 5th starter type. I think he could be great in say WAS as an upgrade over Haren/Detwiler whoever you think is the 5th starter, but he's not going to be the top 3 guy they need him to be here.
Move him to the pen or deal him for something sound. The inconsistency is maddening.
Posted 21 April 2013 - 12:57 PM
Fife seems pretty wild to me, thus far. Leaving a lot up in the zone.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users