Rule 5 Draft
#1
Posted 20 November 2012 - 09:01 AM
http://www.masnsport..._medium=twitter
The O's have a full 40-man, so who gets bumped to make room for Schoop? Could we see the O's trading somebody to open up a spot?
#2
Posted 20 November 2012 - 09:09 AM
#3
Posted 20 November 2012 - 09:12 AM
We won't have to make any tough decisions, at least not right now. If we sign a couple guys in between now and the draft, we'll have to then expose a couple of the minor leaguers, but really, only Schoop and Belfiore are guys you really care about protecting, IMO.
#4
Posted 20 November 2012 - 09:13 AM
Steve Melewski posted an interesting article this morning about who might need to be protected for the Rule V Draft that is coming up. Today is the deadline for protecting players prior to the draft itself.
http://www.masnsport..._medium=twitter
The O's have a full 40-man, so who gets bumped to make room for Schoop? Could we see the O's trading somebody to open up a spot?
I only count 38 on our roster from the MLB website.
#5
Posted 20 November 2012 - 09:27 AM
I've been pretty high on Belfiore since the beginning of the year, definitely see his potential as a solid LOOGY in the mlb. Maybe he amounts to more, but that's what he could minimally be if all things work.
#6
Posted 20 November 2012 - 09:57 AM
I think that is a very good thing.
#7
Posted 20 November 2012 - 10:27 AM
#8
Posted 20 November 2012 - 10:29 AM
No love for Bobby Bundy? He's at least got some potential to be a middle reliever, right?
He just slipped my mind. I would consider adding him and could see a team taking a flier on him.
#9
Posted 20 November 2012 - 11:29 AM
The biggest reason you keep him is because of his brother.No love for Bobby Bundy? He's at least got some potential to be a middle reliever, right?
He is a MR at best...doubt anyone would grab him but I would certainly rather him stay in the organization vs several of the guys on roster right now.
#10
Posted 20 November 2012 - 11:33 AM
Wonder if we could remove BRob from the 40-man as well..?
I might also remove Zach Clark.
As far as who I'd add - Schoop, Belfiore and Bobby Bundy are easy ones for me.
#11
Posted 20 November 2012 - 11:34 AM
The biggest reason you keep him is because of his brother.
He is a MR at best...doubt anyone would grab him but I would certainly rather him stay in the organization vs several of the guys on roster right now.
I don't know how you can say that.
He has some solid stuff too. He may not be his brother, but there are no durability issues or anything like that. He simply had a tough injury and it affected play last year. I have seen him pitch plenty, and am certainly not pegging him as only a MR. could that be what he ends up as? Sure. But not sure how you can say that is what he is at best.
Also, he is the perfect player to grab. Coming off an injury in which he clearly was not himself, not protected, has the bloodline AND decent stuff. Seems like he has quite the few reasons to be selected.
#12
Posted 20 November 2012 - 11:42 AM
I have read his stuff is just ok.I don't know how you can say that.
He has some solid stuff too. He may not be his brother, but there are no durability issues or anything like that. He simply had a tough injury and it affected play last year. I have seen him pitch plenty, and am certainly not pegging him as only a MR. could that be what he ends up as? Sure. But not sure how you can say that is what he is at best.
Also, he is the perfect player to grab. Coming off an injury in which he clearly was not himself, not protected, has the bloodline AND decent stuff. Seems like he has quite the few reasons to be selected.
He showed good GB tendancies early on but now that has gone away. He was awful this year as he got into the higher levels. Control was worse, homers were up and Ks were down.
If he can back to his pre 2012 stats, he has upside as a back end starter...but I am not sure how realistic that is at this point.
#13
Posted 20 November 2012 - 11:45 AM
#14
Posted 20 November 2012 - 11:48 AM
I have read his stuff is just ok.
He showed good GB tendancies early on but now that has gone away. He was awful this year as he got into the higher levels. Control was worse, homers were up and Ks were down.
If he can back to his pre 2012 stats, he has upside as a back end starter...but I am not sure how realistic that is at this point.
You cannot go by stats or this year at all. He was not healthy this entire season. Probably should not have even pitched. There was an absolute difference in his ability before this injury. I wrote on Bobby a little in my prospect list: http://baltimorespor... ... ist-20-11/
I fully expect him to be back in form for 2013. His injury is primarily the same as what Arrieta had with the bone spur. It's an injury that is easy to come back from, and the pitcher usually comes back stronger.
#15
Posted 20 November 2012 - 12:34 PM
He just slipped my mind. I would consider adding him and could see a team taking a flier on him.
Yeah didn't notice him on the list. I'd keep him too. Worst case I think he ends up a solid RP, but he's still got a little chance at a back end/swing starter. I'd give him at least another year to show he's healthy before I'd decide on that though, and keep him around either way. He's a perfect example of a guy that can step in and be effective out of the pen instead of spending on a FA.
#16
Posted 20 November 2012 - 12:38 PM
I have read his stuff is just ok.
He showed good GB tendancies early on but now that has gone away. He was awful this year as he got into the higher levels. Control was worse, homers were up and Ks were down.
If he can back to his pre 2012 stats, he has upside as a back end starter...but I am not sure how realistic that is at this point.
He's better than that. Wouldn't write him off as a back end guy just yet. It's more like WORST case he ends up a MR.
#17
Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:29 PM
#18
Posted 21 November 2012 - 08:52 AM
#19
Posted 21 November 2012 - 08:56 AM
I'd like LaPorta if we were where we were a year ago. But now that we're pretty well set at 1B/DH, that seems like a spot that would be too crowded to get LaPorta any time and he wouldn't be useful for any other minor roles.If they are taking someone in the rule 5, I think I'd rather them take a shot on Matt LaPorta from CLE. Maybe it's been injuries that have derailed him, maybe not, but I'd give it a shot and if it doesn't work in a few months you let him go. I doubt at our stage you're going to be able to keep a rule 5 guy all year anyway, so might as well take an early season flier.
If we cut Reynolds and go with Davis at 1B full time, or Davis in LF full time, then maybe there would be a spot for him.
He's worth the $25k gamble on a Rule V pick, if there aren't any more promising guys, though. I'm talking more about whether I think he'd actually go north with the team or be offered back to Cleveland.
#20
Posted 21 November 2012 - 09:03 AM
I'd like LaPorta if we were where we were a year ago. But now that we're pretty well set at 1B/DH, that seems like a spot that would be too crowded to get LaPorta any time and he wouldn't be useful for any other minor roles.
If we cut Reynolds and go with Davis at 1B full time, or Davis in LF full time, then maybe there would be a spot for him.
He's worth the $25k gamble on a Rule V pick, if there aren't any more promising guys, though. I'm talking more about whether I think he'd actually go north with the team or be offered back to Cleveland.
He'd probably be offered back at some point, but I don't like Betemit at all, I'd rather see him cut and have a little more flexibility on the roster and some upside potential in LaPorta. He's got easy power, and I think a HR friendly park and a chance might be all he needs. I'd take a shot, but that's just me, cause I don't like the current mess of 1B/DH we have on the roster.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users