Orioles.com: UrĂas caps big day with walk-off hit for split
https://www.mlb.com/...-orioles-to-win
Posted 14 April 2021 - 07:14 AM
Posted 16 May 2021 - 11:01 AM
Posted 07 July 2021 - 10:11 AM
.379/.455/.586 in 33 PAs since returning to the MLB roster
she/her
Posted 07 July 2021 - 10:21 AM
.379/.455/.586 in 33 PAs since returning to the MLB roster
I think he has a decent bat, but is currently on a hot streak. I think if he is going to be a utility type his glove has to be good and for the most part it has been.
Posted 07 July 2021 - 10:38 AM
I don't think his glove is good enough to play shortstop every day but as a mostly second baseman and backup SS its ok given his solid bat. Could be a solid bench player.
Posted 07 July 2021 - 10:48 AM
Posted 07 July 2021 - 10:51 AM
Im good with giving him all the reps at 2b right now.
Who do you think should play SS?
Posted 07 July 2021 - 10:54 AM
Tells you how much Ive been paying attention. I thought Valaika was getting the SS reps. They both seem about the same defensively there so whatever.
Who do you think should play SS?
Posted 07 July 2021 - 11:10 AM
I don't think his glove is good enough to play shortstop every day but as a mostly second baseman and backup SS its ok given his solid bat. Could be a solid bench player.
I agree, but compared to Valaika, at SS, he is Mark Belanger.
Posted 20 July 2021 - 03:04 PM
Posted 18 September 2021 - 07:51 AM
Posted 04 October 2021 - 08:12 AM
He ended up leading the team in OBP (in 296 PA).
Posted 04 October 2021 - 10:43 AM
Posted 20 March 2022 - 07:57 AM
Posted 11 June 2022 - 12:02 PM
Posted 14 July 2022 - 08:46 AM
I really like Urias. He's a guy you probably want to improve on as a starter, but he brings a lot to a team with his defensive versatility, and while the .245 / .295 / .400 is not impressive; I like his offensive approach and he hits the ball hard consistently.
Posted 14 July 2022 - 09:13 AM
Almost surely only 1 spot for Mateo or Urias next year. Both have to have some trade value. Interesting to see how they handle the offseason with these two.
I really like Urias. He's a guy you probably want to improve on as a starter, but he brings a lot to a team with his defensive versatility, and while the .245 / .295 / .400 is not impressive; I like his offensive approach and he hits the ball hard consistently.
Posted 14 July 2022 - 10:16 AM
Almost surely only 1 spot for Mateo or Urias next year. Both have to have some trade value. Interesting to see how they handle the offseason with these two.
I think there is room for both. I think it is a mistake to just assume, that Vavra, Henderson and Westburg will all be starting next year.on OD. In addition Vavra has played outfield this year so he could help there if needed.
The interesting thing will be does Mateo start at SS?
Posted 14 July 2022 - 10:19 AM
A FA is a good possibility as well. I just dont see room.on the roster for both. Maybe OD if they are trying to manipulate service time for one or both of Henderson and Westburg but not by May. I think we see one of them moved this offseason. Probably Mateo. Despite the bat the guy is playing a great SS, he has a cannon, and top end speed.I think there is room for both. I think it is a mistake to just assume, that Vavra, Henderson and Westburg will all be starting next year.on OD. In addition Vavra has played outfield this year so he could help there if needed.
The interesting thing will be does Mateo start at SS?
Posted 14 July 2022 - 10:28 AM
A FA is a good possibility as well. I just dont see room.on the roster for both. Maybe OD if they are trying to manipulate service time for one or both of Henderson and Westburg but not by May. I think we see one of them moved this offseason. Probably Mateo. Despite the bat the guy is playing a great SS, he has a cannon, and top end speed.
Yea, if they sign a solid free agent, then one or both could be dealt. I will believe the free agent signing, when I see it.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |