Countdown to 81
#1
Posted 22 July 2012 - 04:34 PM
To finish with their first non-losing season since '97, Baltimore has to go 31-37 (including today), the rest of the way.
Schedule
7/22 - 23: @Cleveland
7/24 - 26: vs. Tampa Bay
7/27 - 29th: vs. Oakland
7/30 - 31st: @NYY
8/1: @NYY
8/3 - 5th: @TB
8/6 - 8th: Seattle
8/9 - 12th: KC
8/14 - 16th: Boston
8/17 - 19th: @Detroit
8/20 - 22nd: @Texas
8/24 - 26th: Toronto
8/27 - 30th: CWS
8/31: @NYY
9/1 - 2nd: @NYY
9/3 - 5th: @TOR
9/6 - 9th: NYY
9/11 - 13th: TB
9/14 - 16th: @OAK
9/17 - 19th: @SEA
9/21 - 23rd: @BOS
9/24 - 26th: TOR
9/28 - 30th: BOS
10/1 - 3rd: @TB
#2
Posted 22 July 2012 - 04:43 PM
If they don't, it's going to be a struggle.
#3
Posted 22 July 2012 - 04:51 PM
#4
Posted 22 July 2012 - 05:21 PM
#5
Posted 22 July 2012 - 05:32 PM
#6
Posted 22 July 2012 - 06:02 PM
With all due respect, maybe the question is what is the number to get one of the WC spots. Is 87 enough???
The one thing the 2012 Orioles have accomplished is they have stayed in the fight until late July. We may not look at ourselves as playoff Contenders but on July 22 the standings disagree.
#7
Posted 22 July 2012 - 06:24 PM
With all due respect, maybe the question is what is the number to get one of the WC spots. Is 87 enough???
The one thing the 2012 Orioles have accomplished is they have stayed in the fight until late July. We may not look at ourselves as playoff Contenders but on July 22 the standings disagree.
The number for the 2nd WC historically has been 89 wins.
#8
Posted 22 July 2012 - 06:48 PM
- Baltimore Chop likes this
#9
Posted 22 July 2012 - 06:49 PM
You could make the argument that the countdown should be to 75 wins...gotta walk before you can crawl.Yeah, I can't get on board with a countdown to 81. I mean in the grand scheme of things I understand it's significance to O's fans but to be quite blunt it's a loser mentality for this to be some kind of goal.
I mean, I get your point and all but we need to see this team do step 1 before we can talk about step 5.
#10
Posted 22 July 2012 - 06:53 PM
You could make the argument that the countdown should be to 75 wins...gotta walk before you can crawl.
I mean, I get your point and all but we need to see this team do step 1 before we can talk about step 5.
Well with my edit, I think we agree. Certainly, I want to see improvement in the record and more importantly the feeling that we are building a core of players that can make us a legit contender. The exact number of wins is irrelevant unless it's enough to get us in the playoffs. 81 means very little to me.
#11
Posted 22 July 2012 - 06:55 PM
I don't disagree witht that but I do think it could mean something to the players and the organization.Well with my eidt, I think we agree. Certainly, I want to see improvement in the record and more importantly the feeling that we are building a core of players that can make us a legit contender. The exact number of wins is irrelevant unless it's enough to get us in the playoffs. Again, 81 means very, very little to me.
But for me personally, all 81 wins means is a better chance of losing our 1st round draft pick.
#12
Posted 22 July 2012 - 07:00 PM
Yeah, I can't get on board with a countdown to 81. I mean I understand it's significance to O's fans, but to be quite blunt, it's a loser mentality for this to be some kind of goal. I can honestly say that if we end up winning 80 games vs 81 it's not going to make any difference to me.
I can understand that pov, part of me agrees. However, while no flags will fly for 81 or more wins, reaching that goal should matter some for the organization. My opinion on this has changed over the years. There was a point during these consecutive years of losing, where I thought a .500 season was irrelevant. My rationale was that all that mattered was reaching the post-season, and giving yourself an opportunity to win a championship. With that in-mind, I was willing to sacrifice wins in any given season, if that meant the O’s would be better positioned for wins going forward. My opinion here has changed. I think it is important that milestone is reached. Mattering in the sense that the organization, and their fans, can have that weight off their shoulders.
#13
Posted 22 July 2012 - 07:46 PM
- Baltimore Chop likes this
#14
Posted 22 July 2012 - 07:49 PM
A .500 record isn't the goal at this point, it's the silver lining.
Absolutely. It's a "check point" along the way.
#15
Posted 22 July 2012 - 07:49 PM
It isn't a goal. It's a step.Yeah, I can't get on board with a countdown to 81. I mean I understand it's significance to O's fans, but to be quite blunt, it's a loser mentality for this to be some kind of goal. I can honestly say that if we end up winning 80 games vs 81 it's not going to make any difference to me.
#16
Posted 22 July 2012 - 07:58 PM
Well said. It's just the intense competitor in me that doesn't really care much for silver linings.A .500 record isn't the goal at this point, it's the silver lining.
#17
Posted 22 July 2012 - 08:04 PM
A .500 record isn't the goal at this point, it's the silver lining.
True enough. It is pretty damn cool, to be at the end of July, and a potential .500 season to be the silver lining. Especially since we entered this season, with Vegas setting the over/under for wins at 69.5.
- Baltimore Chop likes this
#18
Posted 22 July 2012 - 08:34 PM
True enough. It is pretty damn cool, to be at the end of July, and a potential .500 season to be the silver lining. Especially since we entered this season, with Vegas setting the over/under for wins at 69.5.
Exactly. And much of the fanbase, myself included, wasn't sure if we'd hit that mark. I typically am able to be optimistic in the offseason, so, gun to my head, I would have went with the over, but not with a huge amount of confidence.
@AdamWolff
#19
Posted 22 July 2012 - 09:39 PM
#20
Posted 22 July 2012 - 10:32 PM
I know, but have a feeling it will be a little lower this year. Besides, the ANgels, I think the competition will make it harder for anyone else to get that high.The number for the 2nd WC historically has been 89 wins.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users