Not sure if you're being facetious or not. But Banks is a perfect example of why you shouldn't just blindly believe the perceived victim in any case. 16 year old top football recruit who had his future and youth ripped from him by a girl who made up a story that Banks locked her on a stair case and forcibly raped her. Because of the whole guilty until proven innocent crowd, he was perceived as guilty, and accepted a plea deal for 5 years vs facing life in prison. After getting released from prison, he met with his "victim" in the presence of a PI he hired, where she admitted on tape that she fabricated the whole story.
16 year old kid on his way to USC during the Carroll dynasty. Had his future taken from him. Sad story, and cautionary tale of why you shouldn't assume guilt.
Yeah, sorry for never hearing about this 16-year-old kid from 23 years ago.
So he went to court, through the legal process, and took a plea deal, sat in jail for 5 years, when he didn't do anything? Public opinion does not apply in the legal process, or in the courtroom. Thats vastly different than this case with Zay where there is no legal proceeding that will take place, no charges, no statements, no witness testimony, no deposition, nothing. So people are left to their opinions.
If you ask me, why did he not scream from the mountain top that he is completely innocent, and the story is a hoax? Why didn't he let a trial and evidence, or lack thereof, prove his innocence? Put witnesses on the stand that can vouch for his innocence, or validate his alibi? Was there a rape kit used to see if his DNA was on/in her? What were those results?
Why would anyone take a plea to go to jail for 5 years if they are 100% innocent? I understand innocent people get sent to jail too. But I'd take my chances that if I'm 100% innocent that the legal system will prove that much much much more often than not. Rather than take 5 years in jail and don't let any evidence surface.
I'd say the ratio of innocent vs. guilty getting life in prison is probably the same as victims who fabricate an entire story and victims who don't. Even still, innocent people in jail can appeal their case. New evidence surfaces.
If I ever was falsely accused of something this heinous, I'd be telling the world I didn't do it, as loud as I could, as fast as I could. Silence isn't an admission of guilt, but it doesn't help. Taking a plea is pretty much as close to an admission of guilt as you can get. Maybe getting her to say on tape she made it up was some tactic to clear his name. Maybe she was coerced into doing that? Something doesn't add up to being squeaky clean there either.