Fair enough - I guess I still don't get it though. It was an Angelos decision? Why? And if that is the case, what difference does it make in the end? I guess I'm still missing the big reveal or whatever.
I feel like I'm about to use too many words most of which I've already said. Let me try a short version.
I don't care. Most of this 'outrage' started when I pointed out the design is "half-baked' and the rollout was terrible. RichardZ lost his mind. Many people want to believe that the wall move "proves" (whatever) that Mike Elias was fully in charge or whatever. My opinion is THIS wasn't Mike Elias and then...80+ pages later.
When Elias suggests, 8 months after completion, that they want to change The WallTM, I think I win on "half-baked".
Who cares.
MY OPINION is John Angelos submitted it (he's the ONY person who can) with no intention of it getting approved, because if he was really pushing hard for it to get approved, then literally everything up to the point we found out about it AFTER construction started, would be different. Announcement, timing, resourcing, design, picture, literally everything. Outside of answering reporters questions on many occasions, Elias' total time investment in THIS rollout from 01 JAN to 5 DEC is the first 2:25 of Zoom call organized after the announcement in the Sun (Ruiz). I have literally spent more time writing this post.
Why doesn't really matter. Mike Elias put together an amazing project for the DR facility. Every single thing they did correctly (basically all of it) there, they did none of it with THIS. Again...Bob Ross.