BSL: Revisiting Expectations and Quarter Poll Review
https://baltimorespo...er-poll-review/
Posted 23 September 2021 - 06:24 AM
Posted 25 September 2021 - 08:30 PM
Mission accomplished!
Posted 25 September 2021 - 08:31 PM
Misson accomplished!
Posted 25 September 2021 - 10:00 PM
Posted 26 September 2021 - 12:19 PM
Posted 26 September 2021 - 01:12 PM
Posted 26 September 2021 - 01:35 PM
Good. They need to stay hungry, focused, and not get distracted with accolades. Plus, despite being in control yesterday's game from start to finish they really didn't play clean enough to earn it.
Posted 26 September 2021 - 02:10 PM
Posted 26 September 2021 - 02:13 PM
Posted 05 October 2021 - 11:40 AM
Posted 05 October 2021 - 11:43 AM
Demus out for the season https://twitter.com/...420547194638339
Would love to see him back in a Maryland uniform next year, but that's almost certainly not happening. Whoever drafts him next year will be getting a fantastic all-around receiver.
Posted 05 October 2021 - 12:06 PM
Hope the Ravens can take advantage of his lowered draft stock due to the injury. Seems like a perfect opportunity unless the knee injury projects to be debilitating.
Posted 05 October 2021 - 04:13 PM
Posted 05 October 2021 - 06:00 PM
I think seeing how Iowa does against PSU will help us assess that game going forward, Iowa might just be the best non-SEC defense in the country if they clamp PSU
Posted 10 October 2021 - 11:43 PM
Just a handful of schools who had decades of being irrelevant in the college football landscape, and then have been very relevant for decades since.
Virginia Tech – 1936 (when the AP Poll was introduced) – 1992. Only ranked three times in 57 years! In 28 seasons since, ranked in 27 of them, in the top 10 in 12 of them, and ranked at seasons end in 18 of them. 27 straight bowl games, a streak that ended last year.
Clemson – 1961-1976, never once ranked in those 16 seasons. Found themselves in the top-25 at some points in the following three seasons. Not ranked at all in 1980. Won the National Championship in 1981, after starting the season unranked. A little downturn after the title, but their recent history is well documented.
Miami (FL) – 1960-1979, only became ranked in six of those 20 years, and only finished the year ranked once in those 20 seasons. After finding themselves ranked in each of the following three seasons, but not at the end of 1982, they won the first of four National Championships in the next ten years in 1983, and found themselves ranked #1 overall at some point in nine of the next 10 years. Struggling recently...by their standards. But one of the dominant schools for over 20 years after 20 years of irrelevant.
20 years from now, I'd love to add Maryland to this list.
Posted 11 October 2021 - 08:48 AM
It seems like basically all of those nailed a coaching hire and took off from there, right?
Posted 11 October 2021 - 08:59 AM
It seems like basically all of those nailed a coaching hire and took off from there, right?
If not right away, a year or two later. VT with Beamer, OKST with Gundy, TCU with Patterson. Clemson was relevant with Fisher but it's Swinney who got the to the top.
But others have had continued success across multiple regimes now. Wisky and Oregon have had four or five coaches over the last 20 years or so.
Posted 11 October 2021 - 09:16 AM
It seems like basically all of those nailed a coaching hire and took off from there, right?
Posted 11 October 2021 - 09:20 AM
I think what you do is not think of starting some new glorious 20 year run....
You concentrate on your deficiencies now, and work to address the issues you have systematically.
What things can you directly correct / address? (Under your control?)
You solely worry about those issues right now.
An initial goal in this phase is to keep building until you end the year as a Top 25 program.
My general feeling is that MD might break through in the next 2-3 years with a Top 25 year.
And that the harder thing will not be that initial break though, but sustaining it.
If you do sustain it for 2-3 years, the goals can change.
We accomplished that. We know what it took to get 'here.'
Then you ask, what would it take for us to improve on 'this'?
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users