Photo

Name, Image, Likeness


  • Please log in to reply
86 replies to this topic

#21 Mackus

Mackus

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 55,488 posts

Posted 01 October 2019 - 12:15 PM

I think anything officially coming from the NCAA would have to have some sort of Title 9 considerations.  I don't know if Title 9 insists on equal shares of everything or if it can be adjusted for relative revenues.

 

Things that are earned outside of the NCAA or school - such as the example of an autograph signing at a local car dealership - I would think would not have to be equally offered to everyone.  That's an individual thing from an outside entity.

 

That said, I've got no idea exactly how Title 9 works, so entirely possible there are major complications which would make this exceedingly difficult.



#22 DJ MC

DJ MC

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,680 posts
  • LocationBeautiful Bel Air, MD

Posted 01 October 2019 - 12:54 PM

I don't know if Title IX applies to THIS law, because it is based on the athlete themselves earning on their likeness. I mean, if a school is selling jerseys that feature the name/number of a star quarterback or point guard, they should be the ones getting that money (or at least a major share of it), not the men's wrestling or women's field hockey teams. 


@DJ_McCann

#23 The Epic

The Epic

    ^^ That's my name. Don't wear it out.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,120 posts
  • LocationGlyndon, MD

Posted 01 October 2019 - 01:43 PM

Man, if you think it's crazy now, wait until college becomes free.


  • DJ MC likes this

#24 The Epic

The Epic

    ^^ That's my name. Don't wear it out.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,120 posts
  • LocationGlyndon, MD

Posted 01 October 2019 - 01:44 PM

BTW I'm thankful that nobody's come in here with the "the players do get paid! IT'S CALLED A SCHOLARSHIP!" defense. Kudos.


  • You Play to Win the Game likes this

#25 BSLMikeLowe

BSLMikeLowe

    CFB Analyst

  • Moderators
  • 17,145 posts
  • LocationPortland, Oregon

Posted 04 October 2019 - 10:21 PM

I don't know if Title IX applies to THIS law, because it is based on the athlete themselves earning on their likeness. I mean, if a school is selling jerseys that feature the name/number of a star quarterback or point guard, they should be the ones getting that money (or at least a major share of it), not the men's wrestling or women's field hockey teams. 

 

Exactly...and if the captain of the women's volleyball team happens to be popular enough that people want to buy up her jersey and pay to get her autograph on it, nothing should stand in her way of earning proceeds from that any more than the starting QB on the football team.


  • DJ MC likes this

#26 You Play to Win the Game

You Play to Win the Game

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 57,218 posts
  • LocationMaryland

Posted 29 October 2019 - 01:31 PM

"We must embrace change".

Breaking news, more later.

“We have a shot at a wild card right now. But it is not a probability that we're going to win a wild card.” -2022 Trade Deadline

"It's liftoff from here" - after selling on 2022

"We're on a slight upward arc" - Winter Meetings 2022

"I think it's really hard to sit there and chart a course and say, 'We're likely to win the division.'" - Winter Meetings 2022

Mike Elias


#27 You Play to Win the Game

You Play to Win the Game

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 57,218 posts
  • LocationMaryland

Posted 29 October 2019 - 01:33 PM

https://www.espn.com...profit-likeness

"The NCAA's top decision-makers voted unanimously Tuesday to allow college athletes to profit from their name, image and likeness "in a manner consistent with the collegiate model."

“We have a shot at a wild card right now. But it is not a probability that we're going to win a wild card.” -2022 Trade Deadline

"It's liftoff from here" - after selling on 2022

"We're on a slight upward arc" - Winter Meetings 2022

"I think it's really hard to sit there and chart a course and say, 'We're likely to win the division.'" - Winter Meetings 2022

Mike Elias


#28 Chris B

Chris B

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 22,032 posts
  • LocationBaltimore, MD

Posted 29 October 2019 - 01:35 PM

Right move. 



#29 Mackus

Mackus

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 55,488 posts

Posted 29 October 2019 - 01:39 PM

A victory for American values, IMO.  Long overdue.  

 

Very curious to see how much they embrace this new model.  If it's just a symbolic concession and the rules they decide on are going to make it nearly impossible for players to earn money while remaining eligible, that'll be disappointing.


  • You Play to Win the Game and Mark Carver like this

#30 You Play to Win the Game

You Play to Win the Game

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 57,218 posts
  • LocationMaryland

Posted 29 October 2019 - 01:47 PM

Each conf to have their new rules around this in place by 1/2021.

“We have a shot at a wild card right now. But it is not a probability that we're going to win a wild card.” -2022 Trade Deadline

"It's liftoff from here" - after selling on 2022

"We're on a slight upward arc" - Winter Meetings 2022

"I think it's really hard to sit there and chart a course and say, 'We're likely to win the division.'" - Winter Meetings 2022

Mike Elias


#31 BSLMikeLowe

BSLMikeLowe

    CFB Analyst

  • Moderators
  • 17,145 posts
  • LocationPortland, Oregon

Posted 29 October 2019 - 03:48 PM

Good, it's a start.



#32 The Epic

The Epic

    ^^ That's my name. Don't wear it out.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,120 posts
  • LocationGlyndon, MD

Posted 29 October 2019 - 06:56 PM

Capitalism WOW! 

 

Good for them!



#33 BSLSteveBirrer

BSLSteveBirrer

    Soccer Analyst

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,947 posts
  • LocationMS and ID

Posted 30 October 2019 - 09:57 AM

The devil will be in the details. Clearly a step in the right direction but I have strong fears that this will really widen the chasm between the P5s and G5s.  How are they going to put any kind of reasonable monetary restrictions in place? Or will it be open market?



#34 DJ MC

DJ MC

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,680 posts
  • LocationBeautiful Bel Air, MD

Posted 30 October 2019 - 10:06 AM

The devil will be in the details. Clearly a step in the right direction but I have strong fears that this will really widen the chasm between the P5s and G5s.  How are they going to put any kind of reasonable monetary restrictions in place? Or will it be open market?

 

Should they have monetary restrictions on the endorsement money a player for the Yankees can make versus a player on the Brewers?

 

Or another way, do they have monetary restrictions on the endorsement money an Olympic athlete can make versus a non-Olympic athlete?


@DJ_McCann

#35 BSLMikeRandall

BSLMikeRandall

    Sr. Ravens Analyst

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 26,825 posts

Posted 30 October 2019 - 10:13 AM

The devil will be in the details. Clearly a step in the right direction but I have strong fears that this will really widen the chasm between the P5s and G5s. How are they going to put any kind of reasonable monetary restrictions in place? Or will it be open market?


I’m not sure it will. The good players go to the good schools, the rest get the pick of the 4 and 3 stars. Like it is now. It may even close the gap in the sense that a QB backing up at Clemson but is good enough to start anywhere else, could transfer to Boise so he can sell his jerseys and be the star and make money because no one wants Clemsons backup QB Jersey.
  • You Play to Win the Game and DJ MC like this
@BSLMikeRandall

#36 You Play to Win the Game

You Play to Win the Game

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 57,218 posts
  • LocationMaryland

Posted 30 October 2019 - 10:20 AM

I’m not sure it will. The good players go to the good schools, the rest get the pick of the 4 and 3 stars. Like it is now. It may even close the gap in the sense that a QB backing up at Clemson but is good enough to start anywhere else, could transfer to Boise so he can sell his jerseys and be the star and make money because no one wants Clemsons backup QB Jersey.

That's a really good point.

 

it'll be interesting to see how this all plays out, that's for sure. 

 

But either way, big step in the right direction - but I give the NCAA no credit for simply acknowledging that this is something they can't stop. Should've happened a long time ago. 


  • BSLMikeRandall likes this

“We have a shot at a wild card right now. But it is not a probability that we're going to win a wild card.” -2022 Trade Deadline

"It's liftoff from here" - after selling on 2022

"We're on a slight upward arc" - Winter Meetings 2022

"I think it's really hard to sit there and chart a course and say, 'We're likely to win the division.'" - Winter Meetings 2022

Mike Elias


#37 The Epic

The Epic

    ^^ That's my name. Don't wear it out.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,120 posts
  • LocationGlyndon, MD

Posted 06 May 2021 - 04:16 PM

https://sports.yahoo...-143850090.html

 

>_>



#38 BSLMikeLowe

BSLMikeLowe

    CFB Analyst

  • Moderators
  • 17,145 posts
  • LocationPortland, Oregon

Posted 06 May 2021 - 06:14 PM

https://sports.yahoo...-143850090.html

 

>_>

 

Asinine, and unsurprising considering the source, but probably won't have much consequence. As the article points out:

 

A school like Georgia or Georgia Tech exercising its right to take a cut of endorsement money will immediately prove to be a disadvantage in recruiting.


  • BSLMikeRandall likes this

#39 You Play to Win the Game

You Play to Win the Game

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 57,218 posts
  • LocationMaryland

Posted 06 May 2021 - 06:24 PM

That photo op doesn't exactly make UGA popular to recruits, I'd think.

“We have a shot at a wild card right now. But it is not a probability that we're going to win a wild card.” -2022 Trade Deadline

"It's liftoff from here" - after selling on 2022

"We're on a slight upward arc" - Winter Meetings 2022

"I think it's really hard to sit there and chart a course and say, 'We're likely to win the division.'" - Winter Meetings 2022

Mike Elias


#40 BSLMikeRandall

BSLMikeRandall

    Sr. Ravens Analyst

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 26,825 posts

Posted 06 May 2021 - 06:39 PM

Asinine, and unsurprising considering the source, but probably won't have much consequence. As the article points out:


I’d be worried that this sets a precedent that when they ask the federal government to make this federal law, since they drag their feet, they will just cut and paste this law and call it federal.
@BSLMikeRandall




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Our Sponsors


 width=  width=