2016 HOF Ballot / Griffey Jr. & Piazza Elected
#241
Posted 07 January 2016 - 12:07 AM
Oh, and Mussina and Schilling are easily better than the guys you list.
And you're vastly underrating Raines.
#242
Posted 07 January 2016 - 12:08 AM
#243
Posted 07 January 2016 - 12:24 AM
0 Gold Gloves.
Player B: 18 years. .291/.395/.475, 288 HRs. 400 SBs, 2470 hits. 4026 total bases.
1 Gold Glove.
I'd say player B is better, I'll even say similar if not better.
#244
Posted 07 January 2016 - 12:27 AM
Raines also played during a much lower run environment.
- Icterus galbula likes this
#245
Posted 07 January 2016 - 12:29 AM
#246
Posted 07 January 2016 - 12:30 AM
There is baseball, and occasionally there are other things of note
"Now OPS sucks. Got it."
"Making his own olive brine is peak Mackus."
"I'm too hungover to watch a loss." - McNulty
@bopper33
#247
Posted 07 January 2016 - 12:33 AM
It's not because I have a crush on the Expos, analytics, or a hive mind. I just look at Raines resume and see it as a certain HOF resume.
#248
Posted 07 January 2016 - 12:47 AM
Raines has like a 10 WAR edge. He's literally the best base stealer ever on terms of efficiency, and that's a pretty big deal.
Raines also played during a much lower run environment.
Larry Walker has a higher WAR than Raines with about 600 less games played. But screw him for playing mostly in Colorado, right?
That's what I mean. Best base stealing percentage isn't a qualification for the Hall to me. Brian Kenny was making cases for Billy Wagner because his ERA+ is the best. Super. I'm not poo pooing advanced stats, but if the guy is the leader in one category it doesn't make him a HOFer.
Are we making cases for Andruw Jones because he's the leader in total zone runs as an OFer, whatever that means? Or Kerry Wood for striking out just .29 guys per 9 innings less than leader Randy Johnson? (Minimum1000 IP). Omar Visquel turned more double plays than any other SS. Put him in !
#249
Posted 07 January 2016 - 12:56 AM
Moving over to Sheffield, his D was quite poor, and that has to matter.
True. But Raines also had a negative dWAR. Not as bad as Sheffield, but still below average. Sheffield has over 10 oWAR edge on Raines. So similar player, Sheffield isn't a HOFer. I don't buy Raines as one. But Sheff is better than Abreu, who as I pointed out is similar, or slightly better than Raines.
#250
Posted 07 January 2016 - 12:58 AM
Raines has like a 10 WAR edge. He's literally the best base stealer ever on terms of efficiency, and that's a pretty big deal.
Raines also played during a much lower run environment.
Larry Walker has a higher WAR than Raines with about 600 less games played. But screw him for playing mostly in Colorado, right?
That's what I mean. Best base stealing percentage isn't a qualification for the Hall to me. Brian Kenny was making cases for Billy Wagner because his ERA+ is the best. Super. I'm not poo pooing advanced stats, but if the guy is the leader in one category it doesn't make him a HOFer.
Are we making cases for Andruw Jones because he's the leader in total zone runs as an OFer, whatever that means? Or Kerry Wood for striking out just .29 guys per 9 innings less than leader Randy Johnson? (Minimum1000 IP). Omar Visquel turned more double plays than any other SS. Put him in !
Larry Walker was a great player and has a legit HOF case. Coors is an issue with him as is his durability.
Wagner is the most dominant left handed reliever ever, but he didn't pitch a great deal of innings, so that's a tough case.
Andruw Jones was a fantastic player in his 20's. If you were going off the eye test, then he should be in. However, his career fell off a cliff very early.
You're being rather silly with the last two examples and this focus on one stat for each of these guys. ERA+ though is a pretty great stat to reference.
Regardless, unless you're taking down plaques, I don't see how it makes sense to not accept guys into the hall that clearly exceed the standard, and I'm not including clear mistakes in that.
#251
Posted 07 January 2016 - 12:58 AM
Neither is towards the top of my list but If Hoffman goes in Wagner should too.
Andruw Jones and Kerry Wood were awesome players but I didn't see quite enough sustained excellence
#252
Posted 07 January 2016 - 01:02 AM
Moving over to Sheffield, his D was quite poor, and that has to matter.
True. But Raines also had a negative dWAR. Not as bad as Sheffield, but still below average. Sheffield has over 10 oWAR edge on Raines. So similar player, Sheffield isn't a HOFer. I don't buy Raines as one. But Sheff is better than Abreu, who as I pointed out is similar, or slightly better than Raines.
Abreu was not better or as good as Raines. Are you just refusing to consider the differences in era's and the record level base stealing?
Sheff was a HOF hitter, then it's just a matter of what you want to do with his defense, which was significantly worse than Raines'.
#253
Posted 07 January 2016 - 01:05 AM
#254
Posted 07 January 2016 - 01:08 AM
#255
Posted 07 January 2016 - 01:10 AM
Is Vince Coleman a hall of famer?
No but he is several degrees worse than Raines. I get the one category point. I personally think there are ten more deserving candidates than McGwire. I feel like some perspective had been lost on what made a HOF plsyer the first 75 years
#256
Posted 07 January 2016 - 01:11 AM
Is Vince Coleman a hall of famer?
It's getting hard to take you seriously.
#257
Posted 07 January 2016 - 01:11 AM
If you want to talk about eras, maybe Abreu steals 800 bases instead of 400 if he plays in Raines era. Era has nothing to do with his slightly better slash line than Raines'
Actually it does.
#258
Posted 07 January 2016 - 01:13 AM
Is Vince Coleman a hall of famer?
It's getting hard to take you seriously.
But he stole all those bases!
#259
Posted 07 January 2016 - 01:14 AM
But if PEDs aren't a hindrance, these guys have to be on someone's ballot imo:
Bonds
Clemens
Griffey
Piazza
Bagwell
Schilling
Mussina
#260
Posted 07 January 2016 - 01:14 AM
Is Vince Coleman a hall of famer?
It's getting hard to take you seriously.
But he stole all those bases!
Come on man.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users