The Decision Part II
#701
Posted 11 July 2014 - 11:52 PM
#702
Posted 11 July 2014 - 11:54 PM
Ha. I love how it's my biased always creeping in. None of you, especially you, will admit you're biased too.
You don't have any reasonable points to overlook so who cares?
#703
Posted 11 July 2014 - 11:54 PM
Read the Lebatard article from few days ago. I'll link it when I get a chance.
The Heat have this locked up. The media is just spitting out the rest of this BS. Which is fine, that's what they're supposed to do. You guys are the ones eating up all the BS speculation.
Bullshit. You guys keep eating this crap up.
Speaks for itself.
#704
Posted 11 July 2014 - 11:56 PM
He bumps the thread now. Crickets at the time I linked the Lebetard article. Why?? Because what he was saying made total sense.
Speaks for itself.
#705
Posted 12 July 2014 - 12:01 AM
Again, you want to explain how you came to your stupid psycho analysis of the " haters" or are you gonna keep avoiding it.I had said the same thing well before this decision so you are factually wrong about your assumption.
The only reason anyone has even brought up.the debate about the Heats chances is because of your ridiculous assumption and claim about the haters.
You fucking think the Heat have little to.no shot going forward and you're projecting that on the " haters" as a reason they want LeBron to go back. And I'm the one who is irrational on the subject.
#706
Posted 12 July 2014 - 12:39 AM
He bumps the thread now. Crickets at the time I linked the Lebetard article. Why?? Because what he was saying made total sense.
I posted multiple times, but perhaps your head was too far up your own ass to see it.
- Oriole85, Pedro Cerrano and DJ MC like this
#707
Posted 12 July 2014 - 06:09 AM
Again, you want to explain how you came to your stupid psycho analysis of the " haters" or are you gonna keep avoiding it.I had said the same thing well before this decision so you are factually wrong about your assumption.
The only reason anyone has even brought up.the debate about the Heats chances is because of your ridiculous assumption and claim about the haters.
You fucking think the Heat have little to.no shot going forward and you're projecting that on the " haters" as a reason they want LeBron to go back. And I'm the one who is irrational on the subject.
I'm sorry for trying to give the haters a rational reason for hating. That was dumb. I should have just assumed that the haters were being irrational.
#708
Posted 12 July 2014 - 06:11 AM
#709
Posted 12 July 2014 - 07:00 AM
You were/are biased about the Tiger Woods saga. You have zero credibility.
It's so easy to say stupid shit like the above when you're the one on the popular side of a debate / opinion.
wtf are you talking about? What does Tiger have to do with anything?
#710
Posted 12 July 2014 - 07:02 AM
He bumps the thread now. Crickets at the time I linked the Lebetard article. Why?? Because what he was saying made total sense.
LeBatard said, yesterday, that leBron simply just wanted to go home.
#711
Posted 12 July 2014 - 07:31 AM
#712
Posted 12 July 2014 - 07:41 AM
- Adam Wolff likes this
#714
Posted 12 July 2014 - 08:09 AM
I think Chris should add LeBron to politics and religion as an issue that can't be discussed here. This is hopeless.
It would be better if everyone just ignored Bnickle, but that's probably asking too much.
- Pedro Cerrano likes this
#715
Posted 12 July 2014 - 09:32 AM
#716
Posted 12 July 2014 - 09:39 AM
As for me being biased, I do like Lebron, but really, I just don't have an issue with free agents deciding to do what's best for them, whether that's chasing titles, going home or to a great city, or just taking the most money. Taking the most money is the least admirable choice IMO, especially if it's to play on a bad team, but I can't really blame the guy for it either.
Not that I disagree with your stance but only in sports is taking the most money, a bad thing.
#717
Posted 12 July 2014 - 09:43 AM
Not that I disagree with your stance but only in sports is taking the most money, a bad thing.As for me being biased, I do like Lebron, but really, I just don't have an issue with free agents deciding to do what's best for them, whether that's chasing titles, going home or to a great city, or just taking the most money. Taking the most money is the least admirable choice IMO, especially if it's to play on a bad team, but I can't really blame the guy for it either.
I didn't say it was bad.
#718
Posted 12 July 2014 - 09:49 AM
I didn't say it was bad.
I know just talking about that idea. I agree with you that it's the least admirable of the choices you mention.
#719
Posted 12 July 2014 - 09:49 AM
Nice!
Nick Swisher is the happiest person on the planet no matter what, he wouldn't say a bad word about anybody anyway..
Here's more Nick Swisher for you:
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
-
Bing (1)