Ok but it was close enough. Close enough so that the Lakers should be able to make something happen.
It wasn't really that close though...they all gave up a lot of money...and Miami didn't have money into the role players like LA does.
Posted 11 May 2013 - 06:17 PM
Ok but it was close enough. Close enough so that the Lakers should be able to make something happen.
Posted 11 May 2013 - 06:20 PM
There is baseball, and occasionally there are other things of note
"Now OPS sucks. Got it."
"Making his own olive brine is peak Mackus."
"I'm too hungover to watch a loss." - McNulty
@bopper33
Posted 11 May 2013 - 06:23 PM
I saw an article that they each gave up $15 million over the life of the deal (assuming they don't opt out) so that's $45 mill over, what 7 years? So a little less than $7 mill/year. That's not a lot.
Do agree about your role players point though. I hadn't considered that.
Posted 11 May 2013 - 06:29 PM
5 year deals for them...opt outs after 3.
There is baseball, and occasionally there are other things of note
"Now OPS sucks. Got it."
"Making his own olive brine is peak Mackus."
"I'm too hungover to watch a loss." - McNulty
@bopper33
Posted 11 May 2013 - 06:35 PM
Wrong. 7 year deals. Opt outs after 5.
Posted 11 May 2013 - 06:36 PM
There is baseball, and occasionally there are other things of note
"Now OPS sucks. Got it."
"Making his own olive brine is peak Mackus."
"I'm too hungover to watch a loss." - McNulty
@bopper33
Posted 11 May 2013 - 07:21 PM
Posted 12 May 2013 - 01:14 PM
Very true about the role players, although Mike Miller signed for 5/25 that same offseason, which is a little more than what Blake is on the books at per year.
The Lakers can amnesty Metta, so he doesn't need to affect the books.
Posted 12 May 2013 - 01:29 PM
Very true about the role players, although Mike Miller signed for 5/25 that same offseason, which is a little more than what Blake is on the books at per year.
The Lakers can amnesty Metta, so he doesn't need to affect the books.
But then they can't amnesty Kobe.
Posted 12 May 2013 - 02:51 PM
Keep in mind that the player had to be signed to his contract prior to the new CBA for him to be amnestied.
I forgot about that part, otherwise it would be almost a no-brainer for the Lakers to amnesty Nash.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users