But how much less are you getting him for? 500k? 1M? Is that really that much of a difference that you offer Sierholtz first?
With our budget constraints you probably do.
Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:06 PM
But how much less are you getting him for? 500k? 1M? Is that really that much of a difference that you offer Sierholtz first?
Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:14 PM
Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:15 PM
The report says that they made Schierholtz an offer. Doesn't mean it actually happened.
Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:27 PM
Not if McLouth was the guy they really wanted.With our budget constraints you probably do.
Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:39 PM
Not if McLouth was the guy they really wanted.
Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:47 PM
Sure, the report could be wrong...but what if it is true? What does that tell us?Pretty sure he was. Keep in mind that a good chunk of these reports you see out of the meetings are false. Not the reporters fault, especially in this day of having to get it out fast, but they are fed not entirely true info all the time, and sometimes teams will flat out lie about stuff they do get right, so it's almost impossible to know.
I do know that nothing had happened sooner because they scheduled a meeting together for yesterday a while ago and said they'd get to it here. It took a day once they met, so I'm pretty sure they didn't really look anywhere else, they've just been busy with this whole MOO bat thing and handled this as it came.
Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:54 PM
Sure, the report could be wrong...but what if it is true? What does that tell us?
Posted 05 December 2012 - 10:47 PM
Posted 05 December 2012 - 11:38 PM
Posted 06 December 2012 - 09:50 AM
Posted this in the other thread too:
O's made Shierholtz's camp an offer this morning, which was rejected. Thank God!
Posted 06 December 2012 - 11:32 AM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users