This is fair. Trying to remember if they lost anyone of importance off the '97 team. Not that its the end all/ be all but Ill quickly try to find Vegas win totals for those years
Why's everyone ignoring 1998? What was more exciting entering '97 than entering '98? We didn't know '98 was gonna stink heading into the year. Team returned almost everybody except Randy Myers and Davey Johnson.
Most Anticipated Season Since When?
#21
Posted 04 February 2024 - 05:25 PM
#22
Posted 04 February 2024 - 05:30 PM
#23
Posted 04 February 2024 - 05:39 PM
#24
Posted 04 February 2024 - 05:53 PM
#25
Posted 04 February 2024 - 06:13 PM
Mussina won 19 games, was a 3.3 WAR pitcher, and had a 4.81 ERA in 96.
O's had a team OPS of .822 in 96 (4th best in the league) and a team ERA of 5.14 (8th best).
O's had a team OPS of .770 in 97 (6th best) but a 3.91 ERA (2nd best). Basically all they did was replace David Wells with Jimmy Key.
#26
Posted 04 February 2024 - 06:15 PM
Ponson logged a ton of innings, but wasn't particularly good then a bunch of random fillers.
#27
Posted 04 February 2024 - 06:39 PM
#28
Posted 04 February 2024 - 06:50 PM
Bigbie had a short run, but no huge impact.
Paradis, Stahl, Cenate, and Rice were all huge misses.
They did nab Bedard in the 6th round that year.
#29
Posted 04 February 2024 - 07:05 PM
#30
Posted 04 February 2024 - 07:11 PM
#31
Posted 04 February 2024 - 09:24 PM
Why's everyone ignoring 1998? What was more exciting entering '97 than entering '98? We didn't know '98 was gonna stink heading into the year. Team returned almost everybody except Randy Myers and Davey Johnson.
The BP projections for 98 match my memories... expectations were not high.
https://www.baseball...ers-and-losers/
#32
Posted 04 February 2024 - 09:25 PM
Offense was weird in the late 90s.
Mussina won 19 games, was a 3.3 WAR pitcher, and had a 4.81 ERA in 96.
O's had a team OPS of .822 in 96 (4th best in the league) and a team ERA of 5.14 (8th best).
O's had a team OPS of .770 in 97 (6th best) but a 3.91 ERA (2nd best). Basically all they did was replace David Wells with Jimmy Key.
Mussina's 96 was rough.
#33
Posted 04 February 2024 - 09:26 PM
Has any sites done win loss projections for this year?? If Fangraphs did one I missed it.
#34
Posted 04 February 2024 - 09:28 PM
Has any sites done win loss projections for this year?? If Fangraphs did one I missed it.
They are up. Believe the Os gained 3 games with Burnes.
#35
Posted 04 February 2024 - 09:31 PM
Mussina's 96 was rough.
Mussina's 96 was rough.
Still a 103 ERA+. '93 was worse in his prime years as that season he was 100 ERA+. Just an insanely offensive year. Balls super juiced and the players too.
- BSLChrisStoner likes this
#36
Posted 04 February 2024 - 09:37 PM
'83 is the top one for me. 11 year old Seth couldn't wait for Opening Day after spending several sad months after the last game in '82.
'98 is a great one!! Kudos to whoever brought it up. Everything was going ok until Ray Miller said "ask them, they're the ones that make all the money" after a loss. Eric Davis turned half the clubhouse against Miller, and it became a disaster. None of the veteran signings worked out, and Guillen, Carter, Drabek, Pete Smith...etc all bombed.
2013 too, after the "Buckle Up" season was definitely a good one as well.
- russsnyder likes this
#37
Posted 04 February 2024 - 10:02 PM
And along the same lines as 1998, 1984 was pretty highly anticipated. They returned pretty much the entire championship team, and made an upgrade at 3B with Wayne Gross (he wasn't great by any means, but compared to what they had he was for sure an upgrade).
But they got off to a really slow start (5-13), bounced back in May, but never sustained it and were just 1 game above .500 from June-Sept. Meanwhile Detroit reeled off 9 straight wins to begin the season and never looked back. For what it's worth, which isn't much, the O's were the only team that had a winning record against the Tigers that season.
#38
Posted 04 February 2024 - 10:04 PM
#39
Posted 04 February 2024 - 10:12 PM
And along the same lines as 1998, 1984 was pretty highly anticipated. They returned pretty much the entire championship team, and made an upgrade at 3B with Wayne Gross (he wasn't great by any means, but compared to what they had he was for sure an upgrade).
But they got off to a really slow start (5-13), bounced back in May, but never sustained it and were just 1 game above .500 from June-Sept. Meanwhile Detroit reeled off 9 straight wins to begin the season and never looked back. For what it's worth, which isn't much, the O's were the only team that had a winning record against the Tigers that season.
Didn't the Tigers start like 35-5 or something obscenely good? I have a vivid childhood memory of a Sunday afternoon fishing with my dad listening to an O's / Tigers game and in my youthful optimism saying something like "The O's are going to catch them" and he laughed and shot me down nicely.
So weird, have so few memories from then (I was 9) but that's always been one that sticks with me to this day. Pretty sure we were on the Back River too... so yeah, just glad we didn't catch anything to keep either!
- BSLMikeLowe likes this
#40
Posted 04 February 2024 - 10:17 PM
Didn't the Tigers start like 35-5 or something obscenely good? I have a vivid childhood memory of a Sunday afternoon fishing with my dad listening to an O's / Tigers game and in my youthful optimism saying something like "The O's are going to catch them" and he laughed and shot me down nicely.
So weird, have so few memories from then (I was 9) but that's always been one that sticks with me to this day. Pretty sure we were on the Back River too... so yeah, just glad we didn't catch anything to keep either!
Through the magic of Baseball Reference I looked it up, and yes, on Thursday May 24th they beat the Angels 5-1 to improve to 35-5.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users