Photo

BSL: Anyone But Josh (Hamilton)


  • Please log in to reply
105 replies to this topic

#101 You Play to Win the Game

You Play to Win the Game

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 60,563 posts
  • LocationMaryland

Posted 14 December 2012 - 09:25 PM

Ricker Says, Kevin Ebert, and myself had a conversation last night about clutchness and I made the point that I'm not a big believer in clutch, but I do think some guys are better at hitting good pitching than others, and in the playoffs or in late and close situations, you're more likely to face good pitching so that affects some clutch numbers.

Hamilton is a good case of this as he hit bad starting pitching at a much better rate than others compared to how he hit good starting pitching. Chris Davis is at the top of that list as well.

Here's a clip of Clubhouse Confidential that talks about this: http://mlb.mlb.com/v...pic_id=25929170

Yeah, I didn't survive that "war"! ;)

Good stuff here.

#102 mweb08

mweb08

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 30,401 posts
  • LocationRidgely's Delight

Posted 14 December 2012 - 09:32 PM

Yeah, I didn't survive that "war"! ;)

Good stuff here.


Ha, you were fine.

BTW, the example I mentioned of Eddie Murray is a good one: http://www.baseball-... ... Career&t=b

An OPS almost 100 points higher with RISP compared to without and an .873 OPS in high leverage vs a .809 in low leverage.

He's one of the outliers in terms of being clutch.

#103 The Epic

The Epic

    ^^ That's my name. Don't wear it out.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,147 posts
  • LocationGlyndon, MD

Posted 14 December 2012 - 09:50 PM

With regard to the note about Steve Sax being clutch, this is the article I was referring to:

http://bleacherrepor... ... uy-into-it

#104 mweb08

mweb08

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 30,401 posts
  • LocationRidgely's Delight

Posted 15 December 2012 - 12:34 AM

With regard to the note about Steve Sax being clutch, this is the article I was referring to:

http://bleacherrepor... ... uy-into-it


Thanks. Looking at Sax's clutch numbers, I don't see much of a clutch gain. Raines, however was quite a bit better in clutch situations for his career.

#105 bnickle

bnickle

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 38,177 posts

Posted 15 December 2012 - 12:51 AM

I don't believe in someone being clutch as much as I believe in people being unclutch. By that I mean, I think there are some people who let a clutch moment overwhelm them, they become more tight, heart quickens and it's just impossible to stay loose and be yourself in big moments. So no, I don't particularly believe a reg .250 hitter can some how flip a clutch switch and become better than they are normally in a clutch situation. I do believe a reg .300 hitter can become a worse hitter in "clutch" situations. Big, clutch situations are about being able to remain the player you are normally than about becoming something better than you are normally.

#106 The Epic

The Epic

    ^^ That's my name. Don't wear it out.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,147 posts
  • LocationGlyndon, MD

Posted 15 December 2012 - 10:10 AM

Thanks. Looking at Sax's clutch numbers, I don't see much of a clutch gain. Raines, however was quite a bit better in clutch situations for his career.


If it helps, the analysis was from the 80's. When you look at the numbers from 1991-1994 (you can use B-R or FG for that), he was incredibly full of teh suck. Raines and Sax were both in the 4.0-4.3 range for "clutchness" during that time.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Our Sponsors


 width=