Photo

MLB.com: All 12 postseason lineups and pitching staffs, ranked


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 BSLChrisStoner

BSLChrisStoner

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 156,998 posts

Posted 02 October 2023 - 09:46 AM

MLB.com: All 12 postseason lineups and pitching staffs, ranked

https://www.mlb.com/...s=1696255682989



#2 Mackus

Mackus

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 61,354 posts

Posted 02 October 2023 - 10:03 AM

So nobody cares about fielding, huh?



#3 BSLChrisStoner

BSLChrisStoner

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 156,998 posts

Posted 02 October 2023 - 10:08 AM

So nobody cares about fielding, huh?

 

Fielding Bible:  https://www.fielding...ensiveRunsSaved



#4 BSLSteveBirrer

BSLSteveBirrer

    Soccer Analyst

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,925 posts
  • LocationMS and ID

Posted 02 October 2023 - 10:58 AM

Didn't realize the Jays defense was that good. Saved a lot more runs than any other team.



#5 TwentyThirtyFive

TwentyThirtyFive

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 24,955 posts

Posted 02 October 2023 - 06:36 PM


So nobody cares about fielding, huh?

I wonder how much Hicks and McKenna took away from Ced. Clearly Hicks did. Still, Mullins couldnt have been that great individually. His bat was also horrible the 2nd half. He may be about to fall pretty hard. I like Ced but there is reason for some concern going forward

#6 Mackus

Mackus

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 61,354 posts

Posted 02 October 2023 - 06:45 PM

Basically an 0-fer for the final two weeks for Ced.  He was almost equally as good in the second half before that point (748) as he was in the first half (774) albeit in half the time.  They all count, so that terrible streak is part of the second half and was deeply bad enough to pull the post-ASB numbers down dramatically (635).  But I have zero concerns about Ced moving forward.  Or I guess more accurately, not enough concerns to make me hesitate at all to sign him to an extension.  I'd still pursue a Reynolds-like extension.  I want him around for more than his 2 remaining years of control.  Give me a 5-year deal and I'm real happy.



#7 BSLChrisStoner

BSLChrisStoner

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 156,998 posts

Posted 02 October 2023 - 07:05 PM

Basically an 0-fer for the final two weeks for Ced.  He was almost equally as good in the second half before that point (748) as he was in the first half (774) albeit in half the time.  They all count, so that terrible streak is part of the second half and was deeply bad enough to pull the post-ASB numbers down dramatically (635).  But I have zero concerns about Ced moving forward.  Or I guess more accurately, not enough concerns to make me hesitate at all to sign him to an extension.  I'd still pursue a Reynolds-like extension.  I want him around for more than his 2 remaining years of control.  Give me a 5-year deal and I'm real happy.


I'll have to think about that some. 

 

Ced turned 29 yesterday.   

 

Jones' ages 29-33 seasons were kind of a rough decline. 



#8 CantonJester

CantonJester

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,071 posts

Posted 02 October 2023 - 07:29 PM

Ced's not been running out ground balls since August. Can't say I'm seeing a diminished range in CF though, but he's not driving the ball the way he was in the first half of the season, either. 



#9 BaltBird 24

BaltBird 24

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,759 posts

Posted 02 October 2023 - 08:02 PM

I'll give Cedric a mulligan considering the nagging injuries. He was fine in April/May and regained the power he had in 21.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Our Sponsors


 width=