And if they had that, why would they settle?
Why wouldn't they?
Posted 15 February 2019 - 06:52 PM
And if they had that, why would they settle?
Why wouldn't they?
Posted 15 February 2019 - 06:56 PM
I don't think there is any chance that this agreement includes language that - if he returns to the NFL - Kaepernick is not allowed to kneel during the anthem. Absolutely impossible, IMO.
Yeah the settlement was about the collusion keeping him from getting a job. Which means they got a hold of notification to the teams telling them not to sign him. This has NOTHING to do with kneeling and can't control that.
It'll be interesting now to see if teams STILL won't sign him. I know I'll be keeping a close eye on a certain local team in desperate need of a QB.
Posted 15 February 2019 - 06:58 PM
Posted 15 February 2019 - 07:03 PM
Posted 15 February 2019 - 07:03 PM
If this is roughly accurate, I'd suggest that there's no way the NFL would have settled unless they thought there was a good chance at losing. Moving on from this wouldn't be worth anything close to that to them imo.
I really think that Kap was on the verge of revealing something big in discovery, even if it wouldn't help his case.
That's the ONLY way that they would settle, if the NFL had a solid case to win.
Posted 15 February 2019 - 07:08 PM
I really think that Kap was on the verge of revealing something big in discovery, even if it wouldn't help his case.
That's the ONLY way that they would settle, if the NFL had a solid case to win.
Posted 15 February 2019 - 07:15 PM
The NFL does something like $9B a year in revenue. $70M to basically be done with the story was probably deemed worthwhile by the league.
Posted 15 February 2019 - 07:16 PM
Posted 15 February 2019 - 07:19 PM
Based on what? I don't see how this makes any sense unless they thought there was a good chance they'd lose.
Posted 15 February 2019 - 07:22 PM
Based on the math. $70M is less than 1% of their revenue for the year. It's not nothing, but not overly significant to them either.
The story gets some discussion the next few weeks and flames out. Better for the league then discussion being extended through a trial...where public opinion could again sway back against them.
Posted 15 February 2019 - 07:29 PM
Posted 15 February 2019 - 07:33 PM
I don't see how this could possibly help with public opinion other than if what would have been revealed without a settlement would have been worse for PR.
Also, there's no way these owners are happy about paying 2+ million each towards this if those numbers are accurate.
Seriously, social media should troll the hell out of these owners until someone slips up and says something stupid. Just keep costing themselves money. LOL
But for real, if I could make a wild guess...an owner or two said some -very- racist things about Kap while referencing his protest. Again, wild guess. And that still wouldn't be enough for him to win his case.
I think the NFL, in all their power, did want to make this go away, but is that worth more to them than being right? I don't know.
And either way, it isn't going away. Especially as long as Reid is in the league.
Posted 15 February 2019 - 07:47 PM
Posted 15 February 2019 - 07:50 PM
Seriously, social media should troll the hell out of these owners until someone slips up and says something stupid. Just keep costing themselves money. LOL
But for real, if I could make a wild guess...an owner or two said some -very- racist things about Kap while referencing his protest. Again, wild guess. And that still wouldn't be enough for him to win his case.
I think the NFL, in all their power, did want to make this go away, but is that worth more to them than being right? I don't know.
And either way, it isn't going away. Especially as long as Reid is in the league.
Posted 15 February 2019 - 08:36 PM
Posted 15 February 2019 - 09:24 PM
And this doesn't make the story go away. It just moves up the timing of when it's a big story, and makes them look guilty in the process.
Posted 15 February 2019 - 09:35 PM
It makes the nfl part of it go away, which is great.
Posted 15 February 2019 - 09:56 PM
I don't see how this could possibly help with public opinion other than if what would have been revealed without a settlement would have been worse for PR.
Also, there's no way these owners are happy about paying 2+ million each towards this if those numbers are accurate.
If whatever was coming up in discovery risked them more than $2 million apiece, they would be perfectly OK with it.
Posted 15 February 2019 - 10:14 PM
If this is roughly accurate, I'd suggest that there's no way the NFL would have settled unless they thought there was a good chance at losing. Moving on from this wouldn't be worth anything close to that to them imo.
The NFL deals in billions. The controversy has pretty much fizzled out at this point. They could have won, and yet lost in the court of public opinion. This makes the whole situation disappear. Sure it's a couple of million out of the owners pockets. Pretty much what a couple of 20's out of my wallet means to them. They figured settling quietly with a confidentiality clause at this point was better than winning and having the fires flamed again. These leagues don't last like they do without considering what publicity would do to them. The NFL is very image conscious. They probably figured paying off quietly would be better than winning at the cost of alienating those fans that agreed with Kap. It also probably ends any chance that Kap ever sees the field as an NFL QB again. But the settlement takes care of him for life so what does he care.
Posted 15 February 2019 - 10:48 PM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users