Washington Commanders
#1
Posted 20 February 2012 - 11:00 AM
They're expected to franchise Fred Davis.
Then there's the question of what they'll do in the draft.
They'll obviously have plenty of money for free agents.
So what do the Skins fans on here advocate?
#2
Posted 20 February 2012 - 04:34 PM
To me, it's becoming more and more likely that the 'Skins trade down and pick up an extra pick or two. I'm thinking we'll be linked to Tannehill more and more in the upcoming weeks.
Needless to say, the draft will all depend on what we do in free-agency. And I'm really looking forward to it.
#3 Guest__*
Posted 28 February 2012 - 08:27 AM
http://www.oriolespastime.com
#4
Posted 02 March 2012 - 12:35 PM
#5
Posted 02 March 2012 - 12:36 PM
#6
Posted 02 March 2012 - 12:43 PM
#7
Posted 09 March 2012 - 10:40 PM
Glad the Browns didn't get him!
#8
Posted 09 March 2012 - 10:43 PM
What a haul for the Rams!
#9
Posted 09 March 2012 - 11:11 PM
#10
Posted 09 March 2012 - 11:25 PM
The Rams have really set themselves up now. 9 picks in the first 2 rounds the next 3 years!
If Bradford develops, they could be really good quickly. Jeff Fisher picked an ideal situation.
#11
Posted 10 March 2012 - 12:46 AM
#12
Posted 10 March 2012 - 12:49 AM
#13
Posted 10 March 2012 - 02:47 PM
What should they do? Vincent Jackson, Garcon, Colton, other WR? Carl Nicks or other lineman? Bring back Fletcher or go young with one of Tulloch, Lofton, Henderson, etc? Landry or another safety? A corner such as Carr, Finnegan, Porter, etc?
#14
Posted 10 March 2012 - 03:31 PM
An article basically saying how a lot of people questioned the Giants for trading what they did to get Eli. Obviously, that didn't set the organization back years and he wasn't even that good until last year.
#15
Posted 10 March 2012 - 06:05 PM
#16
Posted 17 April 2012 - 06:25 PM
#17
Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:26 PM
#18
Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:51 PM
#19
Posted 17 April 2012 - 11:04 PM
Is it just me or is it a really tough schedule for a team that finished 6th worst in the league?
Well the two games they have that are based on their poor record are the Vikings and the Rams, so that's not too bad, although the Rams should be improved.
The problem is they got arguably the best AFC division in the North. Plus, the NFC South features a couple of teams that should improve (Panthers, Bucs).
#20
Posted 18 April 2012 - 08:07 AM
Well the two games they have that are based on their poor record are the Vikings and the Rams, so that's not too bad, although the Rams should be improved.
The problem is they got arguably the best AFC division in the North. Plus, the NFC South features a couple of teams that should improve (Panthers, Bucs).
Yeah, just a bad year, but I think the last place teams we play had bad years and will rebound. If Peterson comes back healthy, MIN is always dangerous. STL will surprise a lot of people I think. TB made a lot of improvements, and CAR should get better if Newton keeps improving. Could be a hard fought year.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users