Hamilton and Greinke
#1
Posted 18 July 2012 - 10:06 AM
If this team could acquire Headley now, without giving up the big 3 prospects(and preferably not Delmonico as well), then how about we just go all out for Josh Hamilton and Greinke in the offseason.
So, few questions for you:
1) are you on board with getting those guys?
2) Does it bother you to go after both of them given their histories, whether it be physical or mental? Should we just go after 1 of them because the risk is too high to have them both?
3) What is the most you would be willing to go to acquire each player?
#2
Posted 18 July 2012 - 10:17 AM
Greinke is probably just as risky given that he's a pitcher, but I'd be more willing to go after him. 5-6 years at $20-23M sounds about right. It's a huge commitment, but I do think the team is close enough to be in a position to make a large splash.
It may be interesting to see the contracts some of the secondary guys get this offseason. There are some pretty interesting guys. If we miss out on Greinke, perhaps we can grab two of them.
#3
Posted 18 July 2012 - 10:27 AM
2B-Roberts
DH/LF-Reimold
RF-Makakis
LF/DH-Hamilton
CF-Jones
C-Wieters
1B-Davis
3B-Headley
SS-Hardy
Greinke
Hammel
Chen
Rodriguez
Britton/Arrieta/Gonzo with Bundy or Gausman as a mid year call up.
Closer JJ
Setup Strop
#4
Posted 18 July 2012 - 10:33 AM
#5
Posted 18 July 2012 - 10:34 AM
How much money for both though?Those two have been my preference from the beginning. Hamilton doesn't have the wear and tear some other players his age has, and can transition to LF/RF/1B if he needs to in the field. I think his bat will play exceptionally well for another 5-6 years.
#6
Posted 18 July 2012 - 10:39 AM
#7
Posted 18 July 2012 - 10:43 AM
I think we will need to go 6 years on Greinke and at least 6 and probably 7 years on Hamilton.Don't care. Whatever it takes. Even $20m each will leave our payroll around $100m with Nick, Roberts and Gregg coming off the books soon. We need one more big bat to realistically contend, and his would play really well here. Grienke I think has a decent chance of being successful here, although ideally you want elite sinker pitchers for this park, high K guys are good too.
Is 6/120-132 for Greinke and 7/160-175 on Hamilton too rich for your blood(or anyone elses)?
#8
Posted 18 July 2012 - 10:47 AM
Two all-stars = more winning. More winning = better attendance. Better attendance = more money. Easy choice for me, it's just all about the timing, and I think the timing is about right.
- You Play to Win the Game likes this
#9
Posted 18 July 2012 - 10:56 AM
1st- ????
2nd- Schoop- 400K
SS- Machado- 400K
3rd- Headley- 6M
LF- Hamilton- 25M
CF- Jones- 8.5M
RF- Nick- 15M
DH- Davis- 750K
C- Wieters- 3M
Greinke- 22M
Hammel- 7M
Chen- 3.5
Bundy- 400K
Other money owed:
BRob: 10M
Wada: 4M
Lindstrom: 200K
Betimet: 1.75M
That is 108 million...still need another starter, a bullpen, a first baseman and a bench.
For me, I am trading Hardy and Johnson and hoping to fill out more of this team with some of those players. My hope is to get Headley without giving up BMat or Schoop...if we are able to do that, then I think Matusz is the 5th starter.
So, the question is this...is it realistic to think they couldspend 130-140 million on the payroll NEXT YEAR and, would they go beyond that and sign another very good starter, like a Sanchez?
#10
Posted 18 July 2012 - 10:58 AM
That depends on what our payroll maximum really is.I think we will need to go 6 years on Greinke and at least 6 and probably 7 years on Hamilton.
Is 6/120-132 for Greinke and 7/160-175 on Hamilton too rich for your blood(or anyone elses)?
If we can only afford (or Angelos has a cap at) a $100M payroll, then that's too much. That would mean we have about $70-75M tied up in 4 players (Greinke, Hamilton, Markakis, and Jones) for the next 3 years.
If it's a $120-130M cap, then that is a lot easier pill to swallow.
#11
Posted 18 July 2012 - 11:00 AM
For arguments sake, let's say the high end of the contracts I suggested are what it would take...This is what some of the team could look like by June 1:
1st- ????
2nd- Schoop- 400K
SS- Machado- 400K
3rd- Headley- 6M
LF- Hamilton- 25M
CF- Jones- 8.5M
RF- Nick- 15M
DH- Davis- 750K
C- Wieters- 3M
Greinke- 22M
Hammel- 7M
Chen- 3.5
Bundy- 400K
Other money owed:
BRob: 10M
Wada: 4M
Lindstrom: 200K
Betimet: 1.75M
That is 108 million...still need another starter, a bullpen, a first baseman and a bench.
For me, I am trading Hardy and Johnson and hoping to fill out more of this team with some of those players. My hope is to get Headley without giving up BMat or Schoop...if we are able to do that, then I think Matusz is the 5th starter.
So, the question is this...is it realistic to think they couldspend 130-140 million on the payroll NEXT YEAR and, would they go beyond that and sign another very good starter, like a Sanchez?
It is potentially realistic they could get up to $105-$110M. That is unlikely, but possible. Zero chance at $130-$140M.
With your team above, I'd expect Davis at 1st, with Reimold/Betemit at DH.
#12
Posted 18 July 2012 - 11:10 AM
#13
Posted 18 July 2012 - 11:12 AM
Based on what? The very good K rates, low BB rates, low HR rates, good FIP and xFIp, good GB rates, his ability to miss bats or his very high str%?What Chris said. And BTW Sanchez is NOT a good SP
#14
Posted 18 July 2012 - 11:13 AM
Agreed...so that means no Hamilton and Greinke then, although you could really backload the contracts for when when BRob and Nick come off the books.It is potentially realistic they could get up to $105-$110M. That is unlikely, but possible. Zero chance at $130-$140M.
With your team above, I'd expect Davis at 1st, with Reimold/Betemit at DH.
#15
Posted 18 July 2012 - 11:22 AM
Stannis Baratheon: "For the night is dark and full of terrors."
#16
Posted 18 July 2012 - 11:35 AM
Based on what? The very good K rates, low BB rates, low HR rates, good FIP and xFIp, good GB rates, his ability to miss bats or his very high str%?
Getting DFA by a pitching starving team is usually an indicator. He's effectively wild. Another case of the stats not telling you the whole story.
#17
Posted 18 July 2012 - 11:39 AM
I am talking about Anibal Sanchez, not Jonathon.Getting DFA by a pitching starving team is usually an indicator. He's effectively wild. Another case of the stats not telling you the whole story.
#18
Posted 18 July 2012 - 11:45 AM
I am talking about Anibal Sanchez, not Jonathon.
Well you didn't SAY that
#19
Posted 18 July 2012 - 11:54 AM
But since I was discussing him in another thread, I figured you could put 2 and 2 together. It must be the shoulder acting up. LOLWell you didn't SAY that
#20
Posted 18 July 2012 - 12:03 PM
But since I was discussing him in another thread, I figured you could put 2 and 2 together. It must be the shoulder acting up. LOL
Didn't see you talking about him. I'd be scared of Anibal, he's kinda fragile.
Can't blame the shoulder for this one...
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users