Photo

Preseason 3: 8/23 Ravens vs. Redskins 7:30pm


  • Please log in to reply
58 replies to this topic

#21 Pedro Cerrano

Pedro Cerrano

    I Miss McNulty

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 35,634 posts
  • LocationEllicott City, MD

Posted 21 August 2014 - 02:11 PM

The owners would have to give up 1 game each. That's what I meant.

 

Ah.  Gotcha.


There is baseball, and occasionally there are other things of note

"Now OPS sucks.  Got it."

"Making his own olive brine is peak Mackus."

"I'm too hungover to watch a loss." - McNulty

@bopper33


#22 JeremyStrain

JeremyStrain

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 13,383 posts
  • LocationFormerly known as allstar1579

Posted 21 August 2014 - 02:53 PM

Would anyone on planet Earth other than the owners care if they reduced the pre-season to two games?  I'm not even talking about increasing the regular season -- but give each franchise one home and one away pre-season game. 

 

I don't understand why they don't just go to 18 reg season games and 2 preseason games. They will be playing the exact same amount of games, and these days where teams use depth more and more the starters don't play the whole game anyway, so they'd barely be taking on any extra time.


@JeremyMStrain

#23 JordanKough

JordanKough

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,904 posts

Posted 21 August 2014 - 03:18 PM

I don't understand why they don't just go to 18 reg season games and 2 preseason games. They will be playing the exact same amount of games, and these days where teams use depth more and more the starters don't play the whole game anyway, so they'd barely be taking on any extra time.

 

Really, you don't get their opposition to more wear and tear?  

It's well known that the starters don't go 100% during the pre-season.  They don't play through injuries.  And if they are any where near winded they come out.  


Two more regular season games would be hell on football players bodies.  I think it's crazy of fans to ask for 18 games, personally.



#24 JeremyStrain

JeremyStrain

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 13,383 posts
  • LocationFormerly known as allstar1579

Posted 21 August 2014 - 03:35 PM

Really, you don't get their opposition to more wear and tear?  

It's well known that the starters don't go 100% during the pre-season.  They don't play through injuries.  And if they are any where near winded they come out.  


Two more regular season games would be hell on football players bodies.  I think it's crazy of fans to ask for 18 games, personally.

 

Like I said. It's not really more wear and tear. The number of injuries that pile up in practice and preseason says that they play plenty hard enough. With the way they rotate players these days (5th string WR get plenty of snaps, 4th string RBs get snaps) it wouldn't really be THAT much more beyond what they play in those other 2 preseason games (especially since they play a majority of that 3rd game usually).

 

It's just an overused narrative to say that it would be so tough on their bodies, the ACTUAL toll isn't much more than they are already doing, and they are being paid MILLIONS of dollars to work less than 1/2 a year...they can suck it up.


@JeremyMStrain

#25 NewMarketSean

NewMarketSean

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,676 posts

Posted 21 August 2014 - 04:16 PM

No chance they go to 18 games. With the concussion problems and lawsuits, the players won't go for it, and the league won't either. I know the NFL is always looking for more dollars but 18 games would actually do more to hurt the game than help it.


I never had friends later on like the ones I had when I was twelve. Jesus, does anyone?

#26 JeremyStrain

JeremyStrain

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 13,383 posts
  • LocationFormerly known as allstar1579

Posted 21 August 2014 - 04:29 PM

No chance they go to 18 games. With the concussion problems and lawsuits, the players won't go for it, and the league won't either. I know the NFL is always looking for more dollars but 18 games would actually do more to hurt the game than help it.

 

They are already playing 20. There's no difference playing 20 games, and playing 20 games.


@JeremyMStrain

#27 mweb08

mweb08

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 30,384 posts
  • LocationRidgely's Delight

Posted 21 August 2014 - 09:08 PM

There's clearly a difference for the starters.



#28 NewMarketSean

NewMarketSean

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,676 posts

Posted 22 August 2014 - 06:41 AM

They are already playing 20. There's no difference playing 20 games, and playing 20 games.


Starters play about 17.5 depending on how much time they get in the preseason.
I never had friends later on like the ones I had when I was twelve. Jesus, does anyone?

#29 JordanKough

JordanKough

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,904 posts

Posted 22 August 2014 - 10:05 AM

There's clearly a difference for the starters.

 

It's ridiculous to think otherwise.  Clearly a difference.  


Even wear and tear from the perspective of you don't play a full game so practice is easier.  Plus there are crazy practice restraints during camp too.

 

Ask Suggs how he feels after Preseason game 2 and game 3 and how he feels after Week 1 and Week 2.  I can't imagine they feel the same.



#30 You Play to Win the Game

You Play to Win the Game

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 60,544 posts
  • LocationMaryland

Posted 22 August 2014 - 10:21 AM

So I guess all the scrubs who are fighting for survival in the pre season and never will cash in big are just canon fodder so the owners can reap the benefit of 2 extra meaningless games.

There's an argument for keeping the regular season at 16 games. But there isn't much of one for keeping the preseason at 4.

#31 DuffMan

DuffMan

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,759 posts
  • LocationLinthicum, MD

Posted 22 August 2014 - 10:48 AM

Orioles day game on Saturday, I may actually watch this one for a little while.  Awww who am I kidding I'll get board of it and flip over to The Simpsons marathon!



#32 BSLMattJergensen

BSLMattJergensen

    Ravens Analyst

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 978 posts

Posted 23 August 2014 - 02:57 PM

http://baltimorespor...ns-vs-redskins/

 

My Thoughts on tonight's game.


  • BSLChrisStoner likes this

#33 Mike in STL

Mike in STL

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 28,346 posts

Posted 23 August 2014 - 06:40 PM

Pierce with the start tonight.


@BSLMikeRandall

#34 bnickle

bnickle

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 38,177 posts

Posted 23 August 2014 - 06:42 PM

Pierce has to make that guy miss there.

#35 Mike in STL

Mike in STL

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 28,346 posts

Posted 23 August 2014 - 06:54 PM

Noticed Kamar Aiken, not Deonte Thompson was on the first team kick return unit. Does this mean Aiken has the edge over Thompson in that battle for the last WR spot?


@BSLMikeRandall

#36 BSLMattJergensen

BSLMattJergensen

    Ravens Analyst

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 978 posts

Posted 23 August 2014 - 07:02 PM

I think it's between Aiken and Butler at this point for the last spot.



#37 Mike in STL

Mike in STL

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 28,346 posts

Posted 23 August 2014 - 07:10 PM

Redskins came to play. A few big hits already. 


@BSLMikeRandall

#38 bnickle

bnickle

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 38,177 posts

Posted 23 August 2014 - 07:14 PM

Run blocking still looks suspect.

#39 BSLChrisStoner

BSLChrisStoner

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 156,357 posts

Posted 23 August 2014 - 07:18 PM

Listening to the Redskins call, coming back from Va. Appreciate the thoughts of our posters here.

#40 SportsGuy

SportsGuy

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 91,979 posts
  • LocationBaltimore

Posted 23 August 2014 - 07:22 PM

Joe is a statue out there right now.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Our Sponsors


 width=