2012 College Football: (General Talk)
#62
Posted 13 August 2012 - 10:47 AM
I've been to WVU before, I'm a bit surprised it made the top 20. I thought it was good atmosphere and all, but I'm suprised there aren't others that could've been ranked higher.College Football News: Hardest Stadiums To Win In
http://cfn.scout.com/2/1209532.html
Don't think PSU will be super-imposing in the near future, so not quite sure how it made the 2012 list other than the *past.*
Totally agree with LSU being numero uno on this one. I think Nebraska should be ranked higher.
#63
Posted 13 August 2012 - 09:25 PM
http://sportsillustr...l?sct=cf_t11_a0
#64
Posted 14 August 2012 - 02:44 PM
SI: Lane Kiffin now a strength for USC, not a hindrance
http://sportsillustr...l?sct=cf_t11_a0
Interesting story about how Kiffin and USC used the system to potentially lessen the severity of NCAA sanctions. I had forgotten, but despite the sanctions being handed down in 2010 this was the first year their 3-year/30-scholarship went into effect, and thus they are national championship contenders. Check out the story on some of the things Kiffin did that might soften the blow...like making sure he signed a kicker, punter and long-snapper last year so that he wouldn't have to use a scholarship on any of those positions during the penalty years.
http://espn.go.com/c...mbers-add-title
- BSLChrisStoner likes this
#65
Posted 14 August 2012 - 04:20 PM
#66
Posted 14 August 2012 - 09:40 PM
#67
Posted 16 August 2012 - 01:40 PM
http://espn.go.com/l...ay-coaches-poll
Kiffin informed the newspaper of his decision to cease voting on Sunday, he said. The USA Today told him it was not an inconvenience because it was "so early, it'll be easy to replace us," Kiffin said.
Read: Another SEC coach will be eager to get in on the rigging, errr....ranking.
He said he wished he hadn't agreed to vote in the poll to begin with, like his predecessor Pete Carroll. There isn't enough time in his schedule to watch all the other top-25 contenders around the country and rank them appropriately.
"Thinking back, I wouldn't have done it in the first place, but I didn't think about it enough," Kiffin said Monday. "I just don't think I can do it very well -- know the whole entire country and who they are when we are flying back on the plane trip and turn a vote in at 7 a.m."
Which is why I didn't understand all the hand-wringing several years ago when it was revealed that a number of coaches were having people in the SID vote for them. Given the time constraints, I'd trust some intern who can spend all day Saturday in front of several TVs to come up with a vote more reflective of the truth than a head coach.
#68
Posted 16 August 2012 - 02:39 PM
- BSLChrisStoner likes this
crimsontribe at twitter dot com
#69
Posted 16 August 2012 - 02:40 PM
No sense in the preseason being any different from the rest of the season.
If you can't beat 'em, whine about 'em.
crimsontribe at twitter dot com
#70
Posted 16 August 2012 - 09:18 PM
#71
Posted 17 August 2012 - 11:15 AM
http://sportsillustr...p&sct=hp_t11_a0
SI: Conference Report
http://sportsillustr...p&sct=hp_t11_a6
#73
Posted 18 August 2012 - 05:44 PM
Your ideal National title game?
Whomever the two best teams are, regardless of conference affiliation or preseason ranking. I know it sounds like a cop out, and we probably won't get it, but that's all I want.
As for my prediction, I'll go with Oklahoma vs the SEC Champ.
#74
Posted 18 August 2012 - 07:25 PM
http://www.oregonliv...t_river_default
Kelly said he has been asked twice to participate in the USA Today coaches' poll — including earlier this year — and he has turned down the invitation both times.
"I've been baffled by polls," Kelly said, when asked about the Ducks' ranking after practice Saturday afternoon. "I don't know how coaches can vote in it, and I refuse."
Kelly emphasized that he was not being critical of any particular voter, but he said the idea that someone can monitor 120 college football teams each weekend doesn't make sense to him.
"If I'm going to do something, I'm doing to do it right," he said. "And I don't know who's good in any other conference. I know who's good that we play; I can do that. But there's 120 teams out there, and if you're going to judge 'em, you gotta look at 'em, and I've always said that. When people turn their votes in, they should put next to their name which game they watch them play. But no one can do it. ...
#75
Posted 18 August 2012 - 10:04 PM
Not just because they can't possibly watch a reasonable number of the teams they're voting on, which is an important reason, but because there's the obvious conflict of interest problem.
#76
Posted 20 August 2012 - 07:45 AM
Whomever the two best teams are, regardless of conference affiliation or preseason ranking. I know it sounds like a cop out, and we probably won't get it, but that's all I want.
As for my prediction, I'll go with Oklahoma vs the SEC Champ.
Yeah, this is fair, and certainly a reasonable Title pick.
#77
Posted 20 August 2012 - 02:30 PM
Your ideal National title game?
Alabama vs. It-Doesn't-Matter
crimsontribe at twitter dot com
#78
Posted 20 August 2012 - 02:31 PM
Whomever the two best teams are, regardless of conference affiliation or preseason ranking. I know it sounds like a cop out, and we probably won't get it, but that's all I want.
As for my prediction, I'll go with Oklahoma vs the SEC Champ.
We got it last year.
crimsontribe at twitter dot com
#79
Posted 20 August 2012 - 02:36 PM
Alabama vs. It-Doesn't-Matter
Which of the non-SEC contenders (USC, Oklahoma, Oregon, FSU, WVU, Wisconsin, Michigan State, etc), do you think would be the most difficult match-up for Alabama?
#80
Posted 20 August 2012 - 02:43 PM
Which of the non-SEC contenders (USC, Oklahoma, Oregon, FSU, WVU, Wisconsin, Michigan State, etc), do you think would be the most difficult match-up for Alabama?
USC or Oklahoma most likely.
crimsontribe at twitter dot com
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users