It'll be interesting to see if the combination of this change and the change to allow teams to pay players directly leads to multi-year contractual agreements, thereby eliminating some of the transfers and concerns of new faces in new places every year.
That's my hope, but I doubt we get there solely as a result the settlement agreement on the 3 antitrust lawsuits. A world where athletes could be contractually bound to the schools would be the sort of thing they have to collectively bargain...and that would require some form of legislation from Congress that would allow them to do that without the players being classified as employees. Same thing with the ~$20M per school limit they will be permitted to share, which is really just a salary cap in disguise. The NCAA can't just unilaterally impose that, and I'm not sure how or if that would pass muster with the judge overseeing the antitrust suit. This also isn't, or at least legally shouldn't be, the end of NIL deals either. So in that regard the schools with monied boosters motivated to win will still go above and beyond to get the players they want.
There are so many details left to be worked out on this I don't want to get too far ahead of my skis, but based just on the framework that has been publicized I don't think this shields the NCAA and schools from future antitrust suits at all. There are also still pending cases out there related to whether athletes should be classified as employees and unionization that have to be resolved. I think the chaos is going to be around for a while longer.