http://zagsblog.com/... ... e-howland/.
Do they go after Stevens or Shaka?
And if so, is that a job one of those 2 leaves for?

UCLA to fire Howland?
Started by
SportsGuy
, Mar 23 2013 08:45 PM
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 23 March 2013 - 08:45 PM
#2
Posted 23 March 2013 - 08:51 PM
I'm sure they'd be on the list... Shaka should consider it... Stevens isn't going anywhere, IMO. There are some good recruits coming in next year so that'll be an added incentive. Of course whoever takes the job will have to retain them.
#3
Posted 23 March 2013 - 09:29 PM
Shaka turned down Illinois and he's from there. Not saying he won't do the same for UCLA, obviously a bigger gig but wouldn't count on it.
I agree w/Ricker, even more doubtful for Stevens, but I wouldn't say never.
No coach has left on good terms since Wooden for UCLA, just an impossible job. Howland went to three straight Final Fours. Lavin had some success. One bad year or even short period of mediocrity, and your done there. They'll obviously get someone good, it's UCLA. But any coach with a good situation, might be hesitant.
I agree w/Ricker, even more doubtful for Stevens, but I wouldn't say never.
No coach has left on good terms since Wooden for UCLA, just an impossible job. Howland went to three straight Final Fours. Lavin had some success. One bad year or even short period of mediocrity, and your done there. They'll obviously get someone good, it's UCLA. But any coach with a good situation, might be hesitant.
@levineps
#4
Posted 23 March 2013 - 09:35 PM
I would be after a guy like Gregg Marshall...or even Enfield, who appears to coach his team very well.
#6
Posted 24 March 2013 - 08:33 PM
Enfield? I mean if there's anyone who is not going to be motivated by $, it's him.Shaka is choice #1,#2, and #3.
@levineps
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users