Playoffs: AFC Championship: Ravens @ NE
#21
Posted 13 January 2013 - 09:40 PM
#22
Posted 13 January 2013 - 10:10 PM
New England is a 9.5 point favorite by the way..
I could see 4 or 5... 9.5 seems crazy to me.
#23
Posted 13 January 2013 - 10:16 PM
Defense has been on the field for 174 plays the last 2 weeks.I could see 4 or 5... 9.5 seems crazy to me.
My guess is that has something to do with it.
#24
Posted 13 January 2013 - 10:24 PM
Defense has been on the field for 174 plays the last 2 weeks.
My guess is that has something to do with it.
I guess. I'm sure it is also the idea of the difficultly of the Ravens winning another road game against a high quality team. Still seems crazy to me. They get the extra day of rest. Won't be playing in the altitude.
NE should get 3 points for being at home, and a point or two for being 'better'.
#25
Posted 13 January 2013 - 10:28 PM
And another few points due to recent circumstances.I guess. I'm sure it is also the idea of the difficultly of the Ravens winning another road game against a high quality team. Still seems crazy to me. They get the extra day of rest. Won't be playing in the altitude.
NE should get 3 points for being at home, and a point or two for being 'better'.
7-7.5 points seems right to me. 9.5 seems a little high but that's ok. I wish we were a 20pt underdog. That just makes the Ravens players hungrier.
#26
Posted 13 January 2013 - 10:28 PM
I think that's overstated a bit. Many guys on defense are fresh after missing significant time due to injury.Defense has been on the field for 174 plays the last 2 weeks.
My guess is that has something to do with it.
#27
Posted 13 January 2013 - 11:11 PM
#28
Posted 13 January 2013 - 11:17 PM
#29
Posted 13 January 2013 - 11:51 PM
Am I on ignore? I posted this right before Stoner's post above.Ayanbedejo...what you doing?
http://m.espn.go.com...storyId=8841830
#30
Posted 13 January 2013 - 11:54 PM
Oops...just took you off ignore.Am I on ignore? I posted this right before Stoner's post above.
#31
Posted 13 January 2013 - 11:57 PM
Haha - I've improved my game threads behavior of late, you shouldn't have to put me on ignore on Game Day's anymore.Oops...just took you off ignore.
#32
Posted 14 January 2013 - 01:16 AM
#33
Posted 14 January 2013 - 08:36 AM
Need to contain Wilfork. He dominated us last year.
Yep, no doubt about that.
#34
Posted 14 January 2013 - 09:10 AM
Am I on ignore? I posted this right before Stoner's post above.
And I posted it on the first page!
#35
Posted 14 January 2013 - 09:16 AM
And here I thought I was Mr. Fancy Pants. Sorry!And I posted it on the first page!
#36
Posted 14 January 2013 - 10:14 AM
#37
Posted 14 January 2013 - 10:53 AM
#38
Posted 14 January 2013 - 10:58 AM
#39
Posted 14 January 2013 - 11:07 AM
I think these two teams know each other too well to really care too much about bulletin board material. Let Ayanbadejo say what he wants, I don't think it'll have any impact on the game Sunday.
While I agree that it won't have any impact on the game I wish he wouldn't say stuff like this. It reflects poorly on the Ravens.
#40
Posted 14 January 2013 - 11:08 AM
Gronk: "Mr Bibbledeck, Gronk want play"
Bill: "No Gronk. No play. Arm huuuuurt. Can't spike ball if hu~"
Gronk: "NO ONE TELL GRONK NO CAN SPIKE BALL. GRONK SMASH! RAAAANGHGHHGNNNGGH"
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users