Photo

Morse the target the whole time?


  • Please log in to reply
75 replies to this topic

#1 dpsmith22

dpsmith22
  • Members
  • 77 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 11:46 AM

It really appears to me that the O's and the Nats have a deal in place regarding Morse and Patton or Matsuz.

Reasons I believe this:

-I remember when the meetings started, DD said he had a deal in place, that he wouldn't sign yet.
-Rumor mill mentioning Morse being dealt IF Laroche re-signs.
-The O's doing basically nothing to fill their DH/1B gaping hole and offensive shortage.
-Nats needing a lefty out the pen and have let 3-4 FA lefties go by, Howell being the latest.
-DD's comments about only trading one pitcher from his group of potentials. One could look into that to think that is why he said only 1 starter could be dealt, because he knows Matsuz would already be gone.

I know its all speculation, but these are things we have seen, that point me to my theory.
  • BSLChrisStoner likes this
@dpsmith22

#2 LanceRinker

LanceRinker

    All Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,736 posts
  • LocationPlano, TX

Posted 06 January 2013 - 11:52 AM

If that is the case, which I believe is very likely knowing the way that DD and Rizzo operate, then I'd be alright with that. Although I'd prefer Patton to be the player dealt in exchange for Morse.

#3 RichardZ

RichardZ

    MVP

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,276 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 11:57 AM

I do think a case can be made that the O's are waiting for LaRoche to sign and are interested in Morse. I'm not as sure that they have a deal in place, but if they do, would much rather it be Patton than Matusz. I've changed my postion on not wanting Morse to thinking he would be a good pickup. BTW, you could also factor in the Rule 5 pickup of the LH T.J. McFarland into your theory.

#4 SammyBirdland

SammyBirdland

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,019 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 12:12 PM

I do think a case can be made that the O's are waiting for LaRoche to sign and are interested in Morse. I'm not as sure that they have a deal in place, but if they do, would much rather it be Patton than Matusz. I've changed my postion on not wanting Morse to thinking he would be a good pickup. BTW, you could also factor in the Rule 5 pickup of the LH T.J. McFarland into your theory.


I agree 100%. If we could get Morse for Patton, I think that's a steal.
¡Hasta la vista, pelota!

#5 mweb08

mweb08

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 30,401 posts
  • LocationRidgely's Delight

Posted 06 January 2013 - 01:22 PM

Morse can definitely hit and he fits the team needs well as a good righty bat who can mix in at DH and 1B. I am curious as to why he stopped taking walks last year, though. Only 3.6% walk rate which is awful.

#6 bmoreb

bmoreb
  • Members
  • 122 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 01:26 PM

I definitely like Morse, I don't necessarily see a gaping hole at first. Morse does seem willing to play several positions but needs to play nearly everyday somehow. If we could get him and Davis playing full time the middle of the line up would be set.

#7 JeffLong

JeffLong

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,826 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 02:43 PM

I'm not sold on Morse. He's pretty bad in the field, so he'd have to be a DH only. I'd rather work out a platoon with Betemit and someone not named Valencia.

Morse has to walk to have real value IMO.
@JeffLongBP

#8 JTrea81

JTrea81

    All Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,456 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 04:47 PM

I think the Morse thing is writers wanting to put a player on a certain team.

There's a reason the Nationals would want to trade Morse, as he doesn't walk much and hasn't for his entire career in the minors and majors, had a low P/PA last season and he strikes out a ton. His OBP is completely dependent on his BA.

Couple that with him not being good in the field and you have a one-dimensional DH, which is what we are trying to avoid.

#9 Mr. Oriole

Mr. Oriole
  • Members
  • 50 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 05:08 PM

This really makes very little sense. It would be like trading Reynolds and Matusz/Patton for Mike Morse. How does that benefit the team? You would think that one of the statheads over the the warehouse would knock on DD's door and remind him that it isn't all about batting average.

#10 SportsGuy

SportsGuy

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 91,979 posts
  • LocationBaltimore

Posted 06 January 2013 - 05:48 PM

This really makes very little sense. It would be like trading Reynolds and Matusz/Patton for Mike Morse. How does that benefit the team? You would think that one of the statheads over the the warehouse would knock on DD's door and remind him that it isn't all about batting average.

Morse is pretty clearly a better offensive player than Reynolds.

I wouldn't deal Matusz for him but would deal Patton.

#11 dpsmith22

dpsmith22
  • Members
  • 77 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 07:29 PM

This really makes very little sense. It would be like trading Reynolds and Matusz/Patton for Mike Morse. How does that benefit the team? You would think that one of the statheads over the the warehouse would knock on DD's door and remind him that it isn't all about batting average.


If the O's acquired Kubel I would agree with you. I clearly think Morse is better offensively than Reynolds and can play a little outfield.
@dpsmith22

#12 dpsmith22

dpsmith22
  • Members
  • 77 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 07:31 PM

I do think a case can be made that the O's are waiting for LaRoche to sign and are interested in Morse. I'm not as sure that they have a deal in place, but if they do, would much rather it be Patton than Matusz. I've changed my postion on not wanting Morse to thinking he would be a good pickup. BTW, you could also factor in the Rule 5 pickup of the LH T.J. McFarland into your theory.


Good point.

I agree with many of you in my hope that it's for Patton.

I still have hope that Matusz could be a solid big league starter and really think it's a waste of a 1st rounder to be a specialist. But, if it is, it is I guess, but it will disappointing.
@dpsmith22

#13 tennOsfan

tennOsfan

    All Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,372 posts
  • LocationJonesborough, TN

Posted 06 January 2013 - 07:36 PM

I don't think he is worth Matusz, that awesome 2011 notwithstanding. Morse just passed 30 and has limited defensive worth so I just can't see giving up a talented yet flawed lefty.

I don't think Patton is near enough.

#14 Art Wing

Art Wing
  • Members
  • 13 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 07:46 PM

Morse is pretty clearly a better offensive player than Reynolds.

I wouldn't deal Matusz for him but would deal Patton.


Matusz has had almost no success getting righties out in the majors. I really think he's a MRP or LOOGY at best. I've given up on him as a starter.

Patton has pretty much equal value in my opinion and has been worth more rWAR (even with his injury) for the duration of his career than Matusz. I think a lot of people let his draft status outweigh who Matusz really is. I would gladly trade either one of them for Morse and never look back.
  • BSLChrisStoner likes this

#15 Art Wing

Art Wing
  • Members
  • 13 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 07:48 PM

I think the Morse thing is writers wanting to put a player on a certain team.

There's a reason the Nationals would want to trade Morse, as he doesn't walk much and hasn't for his entire career in the minors and majors, had a low P/PA last season and he strikes out a ton. His OBP is completely dependent on his BA.

Couple that with him not being good in the field and you have a one-dimensional DH, which is what we are trying to avoid.

Glad to see you're still posting Trea.

#16 Tucker Blair

Tucker Blair

    All Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,074 posts
  • LocationElkridge, MD

Posted 06 January 2013 - 08:21 PM

Not drawing walks does not mean a guy isn't that valuable. Adam Jones didn't have 5.0% BB the last 3 years, and I am sure most would agree he is mighty valuable to the club. Morse had a higher BB% the past 2 years before last year anyways. Unless you expect him to significantly drop off in production, he would be a solid bat for the Orioles next season.

Depending on the price, Morse would be a fine pickup for me. Patton is absolutely expendable.
Obviously his defense does suck but there is still value to the club and he can play LF/1B if needed.

#17 bnickle

bnickle

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 38,177 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 08:31 PM

Yeah, I wouldn't go as far as to say Wash and baltimore have a deal in place pending Laroche signing but I think the O's clearly have their eyes on Morse and probably have had preliminary talks with Washington. He makes a ton of sense and yes the Nats and O's match up pretty well. I still am convinvced the O's make a trade for a strong RH bat. I do believe Morse is the best fit. Now, obviously they have to have backup plans should Laroche not sign with Wash or they can't finalize a deal but I think the reason they have held off on some secondary options is they are waiting to see if they can get Morse.

#18 SportsGuy

SportsGuy

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 91,979 posts
  • LocationBaltimore

Posted 06 January 2013 - 08:33 PM

Matusz has had almost no success getting righties out in the majors. I really think he's a MRP or LOOGY at best. I've given up on him as a starter.

Patton has pretty much equal value in my opinion and has been worth more rWAR (even with his injury) for the duration of his career than Matusz. I think a lot of people let his draft status outweigh who Matusz really is. I would gladly trade either one of them for Morse and never look back.

I haven't given on BMat as a starter, which is why I wouldn't deal him for Morse.

But, I would deal him for Smoak if the Orioles have determined that he is a reliever and a reliever only.

#19 Mike B

Mike B

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 37,657 posts
  • LocationTowson Md.

Posted 06 January 2013 - 10:42 PM

I want to see one more year of Matusz. In his case, I am okay with selling too late at the risk of selling too early.

Does Jake get us Smoak??
@mikeghg

#20 Moose Milligan

Moose Milligan

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,223 posts

Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:27 PM

Not drawing walks does not mean a guy isn't that valuable. Adam Jones didn't have 5.0% BB the last 3 years, and I am sure most would agree he is mighty valuable to the club. Morse had a higher BB% the past 2 years before last year anyways. Unless you expect him to significantly drop off in production, he would be a solid bat for the Orioles next season.

Depending on the price, Morse would be a fine pickup for me. Patton is absolutely expendable.
Obviously his defense does suck but there is still value to the club and he can play LF/1B if needed.


Yeah, but at least Jones provides something with his glove. I know that'll spawn a ginormous debate about how good of a defender Jones REALLY is, but I think he's alright. I wouldn't call him poor.

I'd be very "meh" on Morse if he was our pickup. The dude has some power though, I was at Nats park last year when he hit one of the biggest homers I've ever seen, a blast that reached up under the bar area in left-center.

But if Morse is the guy you get, why not just bring back Reynolds? Reynolds showed good defense around the bag last year and should have just as much power. Probably would walk just as much, if not more.
  • BSLChrisStoner likes this




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Our Sponsors


 width=