Schmuck believes payroll will be over 100M
#1
Posted 02 December 2012 - 08:59 AM
#2
Posted 02 December 2012 - 10:11 AM
#3
Posted 02 December 2012 - 10:55 AM
#4
Posted 02 December 2012 - 10:55 AM
#5
Posted 02 December 2012 - 11:23 AM
Orioles Approach To Free Agency
http://baltimorespor...ch-free-agency/
Discussion: http://baltimorespor....php?f=3&t=3299
Andrew Gibson over at Camden Chat had them at $94.7M for 23 players (which included all 14 arb players including Reynolds) using MLBTR's arb estimates http://sbn.to/TgKoTc
#6
Posted 02 December 2012 - 12:09 PM
#7
Posted 02 December 2012 - 12:39 PM
That being said, there are ways to get creative if 100M is the limit. Trade JJ for young major league talent and sign Koji to close. Trade Hardy and move Manny to SS.
Be efficient. Buy and sell. Buy low and sell high.
#8
Posted 02 December 2012 - 12:43 PM
They absolutely should be able to afford over 100M. Let's not forget every single person with MASN on their TV is paying $3 per month to Peter Angelos...
That being said, there are ways to get creative if 100M is the limit. Trade JJ for young major league talent and sign Koji to close. Trade Hardy and move Manny to SS.
Be efficient. Buy and sell. Buy low and sell high.
I agree with you on this. We have many different creative ways to keep the payroll around $100 and $110 million while adding good players.
Trade Jim Johnson and J.J. Hardy and that will free up between $12 and $15 million right there. You could get a nice return of prospects and major league ready talent between the two. Then with the money saved you could go after a hitter or a pitcher.
The team also has some young pitching they could trade for a young, capable bat (Hosmer).
#9
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:48 PM
Duq also estimated that the increase in arb will be about 22M....MLBTR estimated about 28M.
Last year, top 10 would have had us over 98 million.
http://content.usato... ... aries/team
#10
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:52 PM
Certainly makes you think that if we trade for someone making good money, like Butler, that we could see Johnson dealt.@masnRoch: Asked more about budget, Duquette said "I know we have enough money to field a competitive team." Added won't get in top 10 "anytime soon"
Duq also estimated that the increase in arb will be about 22M....MLBTR estimated about 28M.
Last year, top 10 would have had us over 98 million.
http://content.usato... ... aries/team
#11
Posted 03 December 2012 - 09:00 PM
#12
Posted 03 December 2012 - 09:03 PM
What would 22 million in ARB raises put the payroll at?
I THINK about 77m.
#13
Posted 03 December 2012 - 09:03 PM
Pushing 80 million...18 players.What would 22 million in ARB raises put the payroll at?
So, perhaps if you add a 7-10M player, you don't have to make other moves to get the payroll down.
#14
Posted 03 December 2012 - 09:04 PM
Yep....MLBTR thinks it will be more than Duq is saying.I THINK about 77m.
So, just for discussion purposes, we can say 80 million.
Perhaps they will add another 15 million but still have 7 players.
https://spreadsheets... ... utput=html
#15
Posted 03 December 2012 - 09:06 PM
Pushing 80 million...18 players.
So, perhaps if you add a 7-10M player, you don't have to make other moves to get the payroll down.
Then they should be able add about 15M. Really they should be able to add about 30 million, but that doesn't seem likely.
#16
Posted 03 December 2012 - 09:06 PM
Yep....MLBTR thinks it will be more than Duq is saying.
So, just for discussion purposes, we can say 80 million.
Perhaps they will add another 15 million but still have 7 players.
https://spreadsheets... ... utput=html
Yeah I was going to say I'd build in a 3-5m cushion on that.
#17
Posted 03 December 2012 - 09:09 PM
Duq has really been talking like they will not spend big on the overall payroll.Then they should be able add about 15M. Really they should be able to add about 30 million, but that doesn't seem likely.
I wonder if that means that if they do get a chance to sign JH, will they just extend the payroll more than they want or will they in fact look to trade guys like the JJs?
#18
Posted 03 December 2012 - 09:12 PM
Duq has really been talking like they will not spend big on the overall payroll.
I wonder if that means that if they do get a chance to sign JH, will they just extend the payroll more than they want or will they in fact look to trade guys like the JJs?
In fairness he said that they wouldn't add payroll through signings. He never said they wouldn't take on money in a trade...
#19
Posted 03 December 2012 - 09:32 PM
I am just saying overall payroll.In fairness he said that they wouldn't add payroll through signings. He never said they wouldn't take on money in a trade...
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users