http://www.baltimore...0,3186917.story
Anderson said he hopes Maryland can build an indoor football practice facility that would be funded primarily by private donors.
Posted 30 November 2012 - 04:12 PM
Anderson said he hopes Maryland can build an indoor football practice facility that would be funded primarily by private donors.
Posted 30 November 2012 - 07:50 PM
Posted 02 December 2012 - 07:41 PM
Posted 02 December 2012 - 08:18 PM
I agree with what you are saying re: 2-10. However, it's hard to tell if they are based on the QBs going down. When they were 4-2, things looked pretty promising and getting a bowl game was minimum expectations. If I had to give the team a grade it's an incomplete.It's hard to not be moving in the 'right direction' after a 2-10 season. Aside from Diggs, everything else looks bleak and we're headed to a FB powerhouse conference.
Posted 02 December 2012 - 08:31 PM
Posted 02 December 2012 - 09:08 PM
I think it's a little more complex than that, it sounds like they are going to get a loan from the Big Ten to cover the exit fee if it comes to that. They aren't getting a loan to cover a coaching change. It's also significantly more than $6 million, they have to buy-out Edsall and his staff than pay for a new staff. I'm sure if you want to donate all that $$$, they'll axe him with one bad season. Do I think think if they 3-9, they'll cut bait, sure. But again, this $$$ needs to come from somewhere and MD donors didn't step with Fridge after his 2-10 season. Thus, I do think if they go 5-7, the decision will be pretty tough. I don't think this is so make-or-break, this is MD football, NOT Notre Dame.While I'm sure KA gave Edsall a vote of confidence, both public and private, next season will be do-or-die as far as getting to a bowl game. No more excuses. I have a hard time imagining that UM wants to enter the B1G with the same coach on the heels of 3 straight losing seasons. If they can find $50 million to buy their way out of the ACC, there has to be an extra $6 million somewhere to buy out Edsall. Just put that indoor practice facility on hold a little longer.
Posted 02 December 2012 - 09:28 PM
Dude. Come on....they'll axe him with one bad season.
Posted 02 December 2012 - 09:42 PM
I think it's a little more complex than that, it sounds like they are going to get a loan from the Big Ten to cover the exit fee if it comes to that. They aren't getting a loan to cover a coaching change. It's also significantly more than $6 million, they have to buy-out Edsall and his staff than pay for a new staff. I'm sure if you want to donate all that $$$, they'll axe him with one bad season. Do I think think if they 3-9, they'll cut bait, sure. But again, this $$$ needs to come from somewhere and MD donors didn't step with Fridge after his 2-10 season. Thus, I do think if they go 5-7, the decision will be pretty tough. I don't think this is so make-or-break, this is MD football, NOT Notre Dame.
Posted 02 December 2012 - 09:44 PM
Yeah sure, except for the fact people stopped showing up with Fridgen there. It comes down to $$$ like it did in that case, if they can get, they'll do it, if not they won't. Talk is cheap, people speak with their wallets.Friedgen had a lot more goodwill, even after 2-10, among the donors than Edsall does. Unless you have to go to the extent of cutting more sports to buy him out, which I certainly would never advocate, I don't see how it can be justified keeping Edsall after another losing season. Especially considering there will be a step up in competition the following season. MD is no national power, of course, but 3 straight losing seasons in the ACC is absolutely underachieving.
Posted 02 December 2012 - 09:58 PM
Yeah sure, except for the fact people stopped showing up with Fridgen there. It comes down to $$$ like it did in that case, if they can get, they'll do it, if not they won't. Talk is cheap, people speak with their wallets.
Posted 02 December 2012 - 10:21 PM
You're right, they do. Regular fans speak by closing theirs and not showing up to games. Boosters speak by opening theirs and offering up the money to fire coaches.Yeah sure, except for the fact people stopped showing up with Fridgen there. It comes down to $$$ like it did in that case, if they can get, they'll do it, if not they won't. Talk is cheap, people speak with their wallets.
Posted 02 December 2012 - 10:23 PM
Posted 02 December 2012 - 10:28 PM
Sure, there a different types of fans. But I wouldn't say the rank-and-file fans are completely powerless. Typically speaking if fans are showing up, you aren't making a coaching change. And you need those big donors to pay up. They can talk about it all they want, but they actually have to pull the trigger.You're talking about the rank-and-file fans, many of whom did get tired of the mediocrity and were fine with Friedgen being fired. The big donors at UM are an entirely different group with a much different mindset.
Posted 02 December 2012 - 10:33 PM
I'm definitely in a different place with Edsall than I was for most of the last fifteen months. I think they were likely on their way to just that (seven wins and a bad bowl) before Hills got hurt.Edsall has to win about 7 games and go to a Bowl next year. I think MD will do that, and I think he will be pretty secure after that.
Posted 02 December 2012 - 10:34 PM
I think he'll get an extension if he gets to seven wins and that should buy him some time(I say two seasons to improve on that). I also think that extension will likely come before the bowl season and will be dependent on how recruiting is going as well. But a few mediocre seasons after that and fans will be back into the "what have you done for me lately" tune, we've seen so frequently across the country. I just don't think this is so cut-and-dry, given how much better 7 wins looks than 6 than 5.Edsall has to win about 7 games and go to a Bowl next year. I think MD will do that, and I think he will be pretty secure after that.
Posted 02 December 2012 - 10:38 PM
Posted 02 December 2012 - 10:42 PM
It isn't "what have you done for me lately" when he hasn't done anything in the first place.I think he'll get an extension if he gets to seven wins and that should buy him some time(I say two seasons to improve on that). I also think that extension will likely come before the bowl season and will be dependent on how recruiting is going as well. But a few mediocre seasons after that and fans will be back into the "what have you done for me lately" tune, we've seen so frequently across the country. I just don't think this is so cut-and-dry, given how much better 7 wins looks than 6 than 5.
Posted 02 December 2012 - 10:43 PM
You missed the point, it's a hypothetical and then him regressing.It isn't "what have you done for me lately" when he hasn't done anything in the first place.
Posted 02 December 2012 - 10:51 PM
I think he'll get an extension if he gets to seven wins and that should buy him some time(I say two seasons to improve on that). I also think that extension will likely come before the bowl season and will be dependent on how recruiting is going as well. But a few mediocre seasons after that and fans will be back into the "what have you done for me lately" tune, we've seen so frequently across the country. I just don't think this is so cut-and-dry, given how much better 7 wins looks than 6 than 5.
Posted 02 December 2012 - 10:52 PM
Still matters, though. Seven wins and the Military Bowl is nice and all, but that shouldn't be viewed as reason to keep a coach when you would then have four out of five seasons, or three of four, or five of six, that suggest he isn't helping the program.You missed the point, it's a hypothetical and then him regressing.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users