Photo

Take on Snell (EDIT Snell to SF)


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 mikezpen

mikezpen
  • Members
  • 156 posts

Posted 18 March 2024 - 04:08 PM

Rumor has it that he'd take a 2-year, $60 million contract if he could opt out after 2024. I'm not thrilled with the prospect of Irvin and Kremer as starting pitchers along w/Wells, who may peter out. Neither am I sure that Bradish will come back as a strong No. 2, or even that he'll come back.And just how good will Means be even if he returns?

 

Too many questions about this rotation.Too many for a team that wants to win THIS year. And I don't like the idea of a desperation 2-month Trade Deadline rental for half of our farm system or making another horrible trade like they did last year, mid-season.

 

In other words, I'd take the Snell deal.

 

They have the money. DO IT!


  • SonicAttack likes this

#2 Mackus

Mackus

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 60,823 posts

Posted 18 March 2024 - 04:12 PM

Zero chance he signs a deal where the Orioles can also opt out, so you'd have to guarantee him 2/$60M probably frontloaded, so $35M in 2024 then a $25M player option for 2025.  And you can't make a qualifying offer to recoup a draft pick since he received one this year.  He'd cost the O's their 1st round pick.

 

I'd rather sign Montgomery.  But I'd certainly say yes if that's a deal Snell will take, draft picks are valuable but I'd trade it for Snell and the money is just money, can't really save it for the future.  I doubt that even the new ownership goes for it.  Especially since you're going to lose the first month or so of the one year he'd be here.



#3 CantonJester

CantonJester

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,643 posts

Posted 18 March 2024 - 04:15 PM

I'd consider 3/$90 with a player option after '25 with Snell, but yeah, I'd rather they just workout a deal for Montgomery. 



#4 mikezpen

mikezpen
  • Members
  • 156 posts

Posted 18 March 2024 - 04:18 PM

I deleted the O's opt-out. It wouldn't happen.

 

I'd go for the deal as he proposes it. I don't like the Orioles rotation as is, and their contingencies are too iffy..



#5 weird-O

weird-O

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,211 posts
  • LocationI'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray.

Posted 18 March 2024 - 04:19 PM

Zero chance he signs a deal where the Orioles can also opt out, so you'd have to guarantee him 2/$60M probably frontloaded, so $35M in 2024 then a $25M player option for 2025.  And you can't make a qualifying offer to recoup a draft pick since he received one this year.  He'd cost the O's their 1st round pick.

 

I'd rather sign Montgomery.  But I'd certainly say yes if that's a deal Snell will take, draft picks are valuable but I'd trade it for Snell and the money is just money, can't really save it for the future.  I doubt that even the new ownership goes for it.  Especially since you're going to lose the first month or so of the one year he'd be here.

From the way it's been reported, that 2 year with an opt out was presented to the Astros, not just a deal he'd take from anyone. I guess we know which team Blake feels will give him the best chance for a ring


Good news! I saw a dog today.


#6 weird-O

weird-O

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,211 posts
  • LocationI'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray.

Posted 18 March 2024 - 04:23 PM

I deleted the O's opt-out. It wouldn't happen.

 

I'd go for the deal as he proposes it. I don't like the Orioles rotation as is, and their contingencies are too iffy..

I can understand your concern for the rotation. But I have to believe the FO is confident in what they have, or they wouldn't have burned trade chips to add Burnes for 1 season. It would be really odd to get a TOR pitcher and then just hope the rest of the rotation works itself out. But like others have said, I'd also be stoked to see Montgomery suit up for Baltimore.


Good news! I saw a dog today.


#7 mdrunning

mdrunning

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,397 posts

Posted 18 March 2024 - 11:08 PM

The Giants' rotation now contains the No. 1 and No. 2 finishers in the 2023 NL Cy Young voting. Not bad.



#8 mdrunning

mdrunning

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,397 posts

Posted 19 March 2024 - 12:53 AM

Zero chance he signs a deal where the Orioles can also opt out, so you'd have to guarantee him 2/$60M probably frontloaded, so $35M in 2024 then a $25M player option for 2025.  And you can't make a qualifying offer to recoup a draft pick since he received one this year.  He'd cost the O's their 1st round pick.

 

I'd rather sign Montgomery.  But I'd certainly say yes if that's a deal Snell will take, draft picks are valuable but I'd trade it for Snell and the money is just money, can't really save it for the future.  I doubt that even the new ownership goes for it.  Especially since you're going to lose the first month or so of the one year he'd be here.

I think in the Orioles case signing a qualified free agent would have only cost them their third-highest pick since they received revenue sharing in 2023. There are a number of teams that fall into this category. They also would not have been required to forfeit any international bonus money.

 

I'd still rather have Montgomery at this point (won't happen) since, as an unqualified free agent, he wouldn't cost anything more than a year's salary should he receive and exercise any opt-out clauses in his contract.


  • Mackus likes this

#9 BaltBird 24

BaltBird 24

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,651 posts

Posted 19 March 2024 - 02:03 AM

Glad he's going to the NL West.

#10 mikezpen

mikezpen
  • Members
  • 156 posts

Posted 19 March 2024 - 03:00 AM

I can understand your concern for the rotation. But I have to believe the FO is confident in what they have, or they wouldn't have burned trade chips to add Burnes for 1 season. It would be really odd to get a TOR pitcher and then just hope the rest of the rotation works itself out. But like others have said, I'd also be stoked to see Montgomery suit up for Baltimore.

 

Did they know the extent of Bradish's and Means' problems though?

 

The Giants have made this thread moot, it appears.



#11 weird-O

weird-O

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,211 posts
  • LocationI'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray.

Posted 19 March 2024 - 08:35 AM

Did they know the extent of Bradish's and Means' problems though?

 

The Giants have made this thread moot, it appears.

Everything being reported on Means, says he's just behind schedule. There's no reporting of any physical issues. Bradish is the wild card, because we just don't know what will happen. He's progressing well, so that good. But something could pop tomorrow, and he'll be off for surgery. Not having him for however long it takes him (a couple of months?) will be tough. But looking at the bright side, he'll still have a lot of life in his arm in Oct.   


Good news! I saw a dog today.


#12 dude

dude

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,730 posts
  • LocationColumbus, GA

Posted 19 March 2024 - 09:43 AM

Glad Snell isn't an Oriole. 

 

Laughing that he's paying CA State Tax.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Our Sponsors


 width=