Photo

Terps Basketball 2023 Recruiting


  • Please log in to reply
75 replies to this topic

#61 BSLZackKiesel

BSLZackKiesel

    Sr. Terps Analyst

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,494 posts
  • LocationMelbourne Beach, FL

Posted 09 November 2022 - 11:56 PM

So this is maybe a dumb question but can you spread the floor with 4 guards and an undersized center in NCAA? I seem to recall Gary and Turgeon having problems with small lineups, and it feels like there's a limit to how small you can go in the college game. But I felt like other coaches were much more capable of getting good results against high level competition with small lineups. I feel like this is a good class but we seem to be perpetually short big men lately.

It's not ideal in a conference like the Big Ten, but it can definitely be done. Mark Turgeon's best defensive team (2020-21) had literally no center in the rotation and it worked surprisingly well.

 

Willard will almost certainly add at least one big man in the transfer portal before next season, and they're going hard for 2024 5-star center Derik Queen (though he's also relatively undersized at 6'9" and plays like a modern stretch 5).


@BSLZackKiesel

#62 BSLChrisStoner

BSLChrisStoner

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 148,578 posts

Posted 28 January 2023 - 02:55 PM

247: Maryland lands 7-foot big man Braden Pierce

https://247sports.co...QPe7ttAr9pVu-lk



#63 TwentyThirtyFive

TwentyThirtyFive

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,238 posts

Posted 28 January 2023 - 03:07 PM

:wacko:

 

 

At least its a big body I guess. Better than another guard or wing



#64 Mike B

Mike B

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 34,526 posts
  • LocationTowson Md.

Posted 28 January 2023 - 03:09 PM

247: Maryland lands 7-foot big man Braden Pierce

https://247sports.co...QPe7ttAr9pVu-lk

Nice, a big that actually has B10 size.


@mikeghg

#65 BSLZackKiesel

BSLZackKiesel

    Sr. Terps Analyst

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,494 posts
  • LocationMelbourne Beach, FL

Posted 28 January 2023 - 06:22 PM

Not a guy who will make a big impact early, but certainly has development potential. Obviously need to add one or two immediate contributors via the freshman class or the portal.
@BSLZackKiesel

#66 SonicAttack

SonicAttack
  • Members
  • 20 posts

Posted Yesterday, 10:49 AM

These new highlights of Pierce are impressive, he has a nice shot and some solid inside moves, goes after rebounds; he looks better than the bigs UMD has right now.   I know it's HS comp but still, the tape shows BIG potential. 

 

http://www.hudl.com/v/2K6PNz


  • BSLChrisStoner and Mike B like this

#67 BSLChrisStoner

BSLChrisStoner

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 148,578 posts

Posted Yesterday, 11:03 AM

These new highlights of Pierce are impressive, he has a nice shot and some solid inside moves, goes after rebounds; he looks better than the bigs UMD has right now.   I know it's HS comp but still, the tape shows BIG potential. 

 

http://www.hudl.com/v/2K6PNz


Right, know he's not an uber prospect, but he's at IMG... that says something. No problem with adding him and seeing if you can develop. 


  • SonicAttack likes this

#68 SonicAttack

SonicAttack
  • Members
  • 20 posts

Posted Yesterday, 11:09 AM


Right, know he's not an uber prospect, but he's at IMG... that says something. No problem with adding him and seeing if you can develop. 

 Let's see if he can become Willard's Joe Smith - doesn't hurt to wish, he does show a lot of the skills Joe flashed as a HS senior. 



#69 BSLChrisStoner

BSLChrisStoner

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 148,578 posts

Posted Yesterday, 11:20 AM

That would obviously be cool.  

I'll settle for another usable big for the rotation.   :)



#70 You Play to Win the Game

You Play to Win the Game

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 57,234 posts
  • LocationMaryland

Posted Yesterday, 11:56 AM

I like where your heads at, but I’m having trouble remembering the last time “needs development” kind of recruit had an actual impact. Hope it works out. Just seems more and more these days, if there isn’t an impact as a freshman, there tends not to be one at all.

In the game threads, people are consistently calling for more Cornish (or for Cornish at all). Two head coaches now have refused to play him. Well, three including Manning.

“We have a shot at a wild card right now. But it is not a probability that we're going to win a wild card.” -2022 Trade Deadline

"It's liftoff from here" - after selling on 2022

"We're on a slight upward arc" - Winter Meetings 2022

"I think it's really hard to sit there and chart a course and say, 'We're likely to win the division.'" - Winter Meetings 2022

Mike Elias


#71 TwentyThirtyFive

TwentyThirtyFive

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,238 posts

Posted Yesterday, 12:16 PM


Let's see if he can become Willard's Joe Smith - doesn't hurt to wish, he does show a lot of the skills Joe flashed as a HS senior.

Whoa whoa whoa. Calm down there.

#72 BSLChrisStoner

BSLChrisStoner

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 148,578 posts

Posted Yesterday, 12:19 PM

I like where your heads at, but I’m having trouble remembering the last time “needs development” kind of recruit had an actual impact. Hope it works out. Just seems more and more these days, if there isn’t an impact as a freshman, there tends not to be one at all.

In the game threads, people are consistently calling for more Cornish (or for Cornish at all). Two head coaches now have refused to play him. Well, three including Manning.


 

I don't think every recruit needs to be an impact player.   Don't expect Swanton-Rodger to ever be impactful, but he's showing some signs of being a solid rotation guy.  Would be looking for the same here.  Revaz is the other side. He's now a Jr, and completely unusable on a team that lacks size. 

 

To argue the other side, there are only so many scholarships to go around, taking someone to just be part of the rotation, and doubting if he can ever be a significant contributor...  can argue that's pointless, and should just go for additions in the transfer market.   But maybe you want program stability, and not a full revolving door roster wise.

 

Cornish totally different imo.  That's a kid that was a Top 90 player Nationally, and more was expected.  Him not playing at all at this point, is definitely disappointing.  And agree, when you've had the coaching change, and he's had a year to adjust to college, and he can't crack the rotation... that's not good.



#73 You Play to Win the Game

You Play to Win the Game

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 57,234 posts
  • LocationMaryland

Posted Yesterday, 12:39 PM

My point with Cornish is, he didn’t contribute at all as a freshman, and in college hoops, that’s a pretty damning sign for the future these days.

Agree though, I’m not upset at the get. Just pointing out the “needs development” pretty much pours cold water on it for me.

“We have a shot at a wild card right now. But it is not a probability that we're going to win a wild card.” -2022 Trade Deadline

"It's liftoff from here" - after selling on 2022

"We're on a slight upward arc" - Winter Meetings 2022

"I think it's really hard to sit there and chart a course and say, 'We're likely to win the division.'" - Winter Meetings 2022

Mike Elias


#74 Mackus

Mackus

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 55,497 posts

Posted Yesterday, 12:44 PM

I like where your heads at, but I’m having trouble remembering the last time “needs development” kind of recruit had an actual impact. Hope it works out. Just seems more and more these days, if there isn’t an impact as a freshman, there tends not to be one at all.

In the game threads, people are consistently calling for more Cornish (or for Cornish at all). Two head coaches now have refused to play him. Well, three including Manning.

Future stars will almost always contribute right away at least a little bit, but there are more of upperclassmen rotational guys and solid starters who had to develop over time

Hart is an example.

Going back further...Cheko, Dodd, Bender. Way further back used to happen a lot more often, partly because Gary was great at that and partly because guys stayed more frequently even if they didn't get much run as a frosh so there was more development. Landon Milbourne always been a favorite of mine that followed that path during the later Gary era. Sarunas my favorite from the earlier years.

#75 TwentyThirtyFive

TwentyThirtyFive

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,238 posts

Posted Yesterday, 01:03 PM

I feel like Sarunus was contributing early in his career. Im nitpicking and I might be wrong. Its been a long time

#76 TwentyThirtyFive

TwentyThirtyFive

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,238 posts

Posted Yesterday, 01:07 PM

Sarunus took the big jump between sophomore and junior years. He still was doing more in his first 2 years than Cornish is doing. Seems quite unlikely Cornish will make the kind of jump Sarunus made in year 3




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Our Sponsors


 width=  width=