Malzahn said he would only come interview at MD if he was guaranteed to take the job. At the time, I would not have given him the job without interviewing him but I absolutely would have done it if the alternative was Edsall.
Also, Franklin was under contract and would have certainly stayed if offered the job initially. Which, again, I wouldn't have done but if it was him or Edsall, I absolutely would have done it. And no way was Vandy a better job than MD at the time.
And Mike Leach having character issues is YOUR OPINION. If you want to let the media cloud your judgment and make conclusions for you, then that's on you. I've done my research on Lech and know people who know Leach, and he isn't a crazy man. In fact, if you're talking about character issues, I'd say the way Edsall handled his departure at UCONN is worse than a guy who likes pirates or who didn't get a long with a player who EVERYONE has come out and said was a prima donna and who was trying to hang off of his daddy's titty.
Leach is an interesting, intelligent guy. Loved him on 60 minutes at the height of the Texas Tech success. Don't think I agree with Zack saying he had character issues. Do think it is fair to say that MD did not want him or his personality.. don't think it is reach to say they were scared off by the issues that were surrounding Leach at the time with James.
Those issues might have been basically nothing, but it's not like a bunch of other schools were banging down Leach's door either. He might yet build up Washington State, but the fact that Washington State is where he is at says something, right? That even if MD's perception of Leach was wrong, that plenty of other schools had the same perception?