
Cleveland Cavaliers
#21
Posted 15 July 2014 - 11:51 AM
#22
Posted 15 July 2014 - 12:17 PM
I definitely don't do the deal Cleveland is proposing if I'm Minnesota. Bennett and Thompson are dead weight (pun intended in Bennett's case) considering they will make $5.5 million each this season. Waiters could be a nice piece for them, but they've already got Kevin Martin under contract for the next three seasons, so unless they can move him that doesn't really make sense either.
- Dupin likes this
#23
Posted 15 July 2014 - 12:47 PM
#24
Posted 15 July 2014 - 12:50 PM
Why not reopen talks with GS?
If Cleveland is gonna play hard ball, there are 28 other NBA teams that would "love" to have Love.
There is baseball, and occasionally there are other things of note
"Now OPS sucks. Got it."
"Making his own olive brine is peak Mackus."
"I'm too hungover to watch a loss." - McNulty
@bopper33
#25
Posted 15 July 2014 - 02:44 PM
Why not reopen talks with GS?
If Cleveland is gonna play hard ball, there are 28 other NBA teams that would "love" to have Love.
Well not many teams have assets that they are willing to part with to land Love. I wouldn't even want Klay that much if I were Minnesota.
#26
Posted 16 July 2014 - 04:00 AM
#27
Posted 17 July 2014 - 06:21 PM
@WindhorstESPN LeBron intrigued w/Andrew Wiggins' potential but has made clear to Cavs he wants to compete for title now. Going after Love fits message
#28
Posted 18 July 2014 - 08:19 AM
Looks like the Wiggins for Love trade could be going down here soon. A lot of smoke this morning about this.
I think it's smart for the Cavs, and the right thing to do. I'm in the minority, but I truly think that Wiggins is going to be a bust.
#29
Posted 18 July 2014 - 08:25 AM
A lot of people saying they wouldn't deal Wiggins for Love. I mean, I get it...but that seems to me to be a situation where people who wouldn't deal him would be doing so because of the fear that WIggins becomes a stud.
Love already is a stud, is young, a perfect fit for that team and is willing to sign long term in Clev, which was something they couldn't secure from anyone when they had LeBron the first time.
This move is all about helping LeBron and showing him that you are committed long term, which they didn't show him the first time around.
#30
Posted 18 July 2014 - 09:55 AM
Love has some question marks as well though. He has never been on a winning team. Yes he works off the ball but Lebron will be feeding it to him so he will be expected to create more shots. Can he do that and still be as effective? Will his rebounding take a hit on a better team. Just some questions out there.
#31
Posted 18 July 2014 - 11:57 AM
#32
Posted 18 July 2014 - 03:59 PM
Love has some question marks as well though. He has never been on a winning team. Yes he works off the ball but Lebron will be feeding it to him so he will be expected to create more shots. Can he do that and still be as effective? Will his rebounding take a hit on a better team. Just some questions out there.
Only legitimate question mark is health.
#33
Posted 18 July 2014 - 04:11 PM
Only legitimate question mark is health.
I mean, he's pretty bad defensively too.
There is baseball, and occasionally there are other things of note
"Now OPS sucks. Got it."
"Making his own olive brine is peak Mackus."
"I'm too hungover to watch a loss." - McNulty
@bopper33
#34
Posted 18 July 2014 - 06:57 PM
Only legitimate question mark is health.
I mean, he's pretty bad defensively too.
He can't protect the rim, but he can body guys up decently and defensive rebounding is part of defense and in that, he excels.
#35
Posted 18 July 2014 - 07:02 PM
Love is a better fit for LBJ than Bosh or Wade were too.
Clev is going to be better on paper than Miami ever was.
#36
Posted 18 July 2014 - 08:22 PM
#37
Posted 18 July 2014 - 08:37 PM
The more I hear from Blatt the more I think Cleveland may have struck gold. Of course with LeBron and maybe Love, it might be tough to truly evaluate his actual impact. But I like him.
People accused Phil Jackson of riding talented players too. I'm definitely interested to see how he does though.
#38
Posted 18 July 2014 - 08:49 PM
People accused Phil Jackson of riding talented players too. I'm definitely interested to see how he does though.
He won in two different places, that's enough for me. If things don't work out, he's getting blamed. I know it's not the same thing, but I'll be interested to see how he does with the Knicks.
I do wonder if the college coaches regret turning down the Cavs knowing what they know now?
#39
Posted 21 July 2014 - 07:36 AM
Sports on Earth: The path of least resistance (Love vs. Wiggins)
http://www.sportsone...success#!bi8RO5
#40
Posted 05 August 2014 - 08:21 AM
Sports Illustrated: Three-team Love deal 'Is done,' could involve Bennett
http://www.si.com/nb...es-philadelphia
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users