He also can get the damn wall out of his head now and go back to pulling the ball more. Whether we keep him or trade him I can see Mounty having a good season
2024 Winter Meetings
#221
Posted 11 December 2024 - 07:27 PM
#222
Posted 11 December 2024 - 09:37 PM
Go get Sandy Alcantara from FL.
#223
Posted 11 December 2024 - 09:50 PM
#224
Posted 11 December 2024 - 10:04 PM
Pretty sure with Rogers the Best Buy policy is in effect - no returns or exchanges after 14 days.
- BaltBird 24 likes this
#225
Posted 11 December 2024 - 10:34 PM
Ill say it right now. The Rogers trade will end up a win for us.
#226
Posted 11 December 2024 - 10:43 PM
#227
Posted 11 December 2024 - 11:04 PM
It’s already a L given the context IMO. We got him for the playoff run and was awful. Didn’t even stay on the roster through the conclusion of the regular season, much less the post season. Just dumb, I’ll always stand by that. Preferring team control of a bad asset to getting better for the current team. More SDE from Elias.
I’ll say it right now. The Rogers trade will end up a win for us.
- BSLMikeLowe, Mackus, BaltBird 24 and 2 others like this
#228
Posted 11 December 2024 - 11:27 PM
#229
Posted 11 December 2024 - 11:27 PM
- Ravens2006 likes this
#230
Posted 11 December 2024 - 11:29 PM
#231
Posted 11 December 2024 - 11:30 PM
His savant page was terrible at the time of the trade, though. Wasn't much to be excited about with any of his advanced metrics.
#232
Posted 11 December 2024 - 11:40 PM
#233
Posted 12 December 2024 - 07:12 AM
It was a really bad trade in both theory and practice. Gave up too much for a back-end starter. Him pitching horribly right away was a bit unexpected, but a back-end starter being awful for a few months is not unexpected, so its just the immediacy of the timing that was unfortunate. Also the timing of Westburg's injury right after followed by Mayo falling flat in his debut that would've created an opportunity for Norby.
The Flaherty trade was kind of similar (though not as bad IMO). Questionable on its merits, but looks worse if you consider it in the context of what we really needed to add. That it blew up instantly is a bit beyond the control of anyone involved. But wouldn't have been enough even if it didn't lead to a worst-case result.
- russsnyder likes this
#234
Posted 12 December 2024 - 07:25 AM
Advanced metrics can also become a reason to waste a lot of time and money (and sometimes prospects) on trying to make a player something he will never be no matter what the number crunching analysis might suggest possible. A 1.4+ WHIP over 4+ major league seasons... and 27.5 years old on opening day 2025... plenty of reason to think he's "just a guy" at best.
#235
Posted 12 December 2024 - 07:41 AM
Advanced metrics can also become a reason to waste a lot of time and money (and sometimes prospects) on trying to make a player something he will never be no matter what the number crunching analysis might suggest possible. A 1.4+ WHIP over 4+ major league seasons... and 27.5 years old on opening day 2025... plenty of reason to think he's "just a guy" at best.
Rogers advanced metrics screamed stay as far away as possible. They were way worse than his actual on field results.
#236
Posted 12 December 2024 - 05:47 PM
It was a really bad trade in both theory and practice. Gave up too much for a back-end starter. Him pitching horribly right away was a bit unexpected, but a back-end starter being awful for a few months is not unexpected, so its just the immediacy of the timing that was unfortunate. Also the timing of Westburg's injury right after followed by Mayo falling flat in his debut that would've created an opportunity for Norby.
The Flaherty trade was kind of similar (though not as bad IMO). Questionable on its merits, but looks worse if you consider it in the context of what we really needed to add. That it blew up instantly is a bit beyond the control of anyone involved. But wouldn't have been enough even if it didn't lead to a worst-case result.
I think this is an excellent assessment.
That said, maybe Rogers finds himself.
#237
Posted 13 December 2024 - 10:24 AM
One thing I believe is a bit misleading is to say an O's rotation of 1-5 is such and such. A solid 1-3 and a 4 and 5 as good as most teams 4 and 5 doesn't cut it for me. We need to be able to say our 1-3 are as good as any playoff team and our 4 and 5 are at least as good if not better.
I could care less if the O's 2025 rotation looks ok compared to the likes of say the Rockies. I want to be able to say we stack up well compared to the Yankees and Red Sox.
#238
Posted 13 December 2024 - 12:58 PM
Rogers sucks dude. Doubtful he even pitches in the majors again much less makes this trade a W.
#239
Posted 13 December 2024 - 01:03 PM
Rogers sucks dude. Doubtful he even pitches in the majors again much less makes this trade a W.
I think it's plausible that Rogers gets fixed and becomes fine, but that's still not a move you make at the deadline. It's always an L for opportunity cost alone IMO.
#240
Posted 13 December 2024 - 02:49 PM
Tucker to Cubs for Isaac Parades, Hayden Wesneski and a back-end top-10 prospect.
Parades is a good, young, and controllable player. Closest thing we have to him would be Westburg, though Westburg has 2 more years of control so would be more valuable.
Tucker is a fantastic hitter, but a free agent after the year. Surprised to see Houston selling. But maybe this is an opening to go after Framber Valdez. Pending FA, as well, but a stud. Like him better than going after Cease.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users