2024 Game 108: 7/30 Toronto 6:35PM
#81
Posted 30 July 2024 - 09:24 PM
#82
Posted 30 July 2024 - 09:35 PM
#83
Posted 30 July 2024 - 10:05 PM
#84
Posted 30 July 2024 - 10:15 PM
After the way the division winners who didn’t play in the WC round fared last year in the playoffs, I’m not dead set on it. But I do still want the division, obviously. I would never want the Yankees to finish ahead of us. But if we are a WC team, I’m not going to be heartbroken over it. Momentum being stalled is a real thing. As is timing being thrown off, etc.
Don't talk yourself into not wanting the division. Much better chance of getting to ALCS as a team with a bye than without. I'll hear from those saying you'd rather be the WC winner with your rotation out of whack than the team sitting cold for half a week with everything lined up, but that argument makes an assumption than just isn't reasonable. Every series is risky, so skip the WC round.
#85
Posted 30 July 2024 - 10:19 PM
Anyone who says they'd rather play in the WC round vs having to figure out how to stay ready during a few days off needs to have their head examined.
#86
Posted 30 July 2024 - 10:29 PM
#87
Posted 30 July 2024 - 10:35 PM
I'm still salty over Chace. I'm sure Bob is, too.
Yeah him being thrown in there stung. Reminded me of Showalter being the third piece in the Flaherty trade last year.
#88
Posted 30 July 2024 - 10:43 PM
Please go re-read my post, thanks.
My post wasn't directed at you. I read what you said. I was recalling how so many (not on here) were saying what a disadvantage it was to have the bye last year because 3 of 4 teams that had it got knocked out in the DS, two of them swept.
#89
Posted 30 July 2024 - 10:45 PM
My post wasn't directed at you. I read what you said. I was recalling how so many (not on here) were saying what a disadvantage it was to have the bye last year because 3 of 4 teams that had it got knocked out in the DS, two of them swept.
Oh, some said it on here too
#90
Posted 30 July 2024 - 11:06 PM
Oh, some said it on here too
Then I stand corrected. That's just silly.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users