Since some folks in this thread are grading the deadline trade by the end of the season results, I'll follow suit and say that further supports the argument for not trading Lopez, since the O's would eventually need to have a substitute for Bautista and/or Tate.
That's fair, right? Two way street, and all that?
My opinions of the trades hasn’t changed (I was very alone at the time), if anything I only like them more just by learning more about the players we acquired.