ESPN's Match-up Predictor gives Cincinnati a 51.7% chance of winning.
Posted 03 October 2022 - 10:38 AM
ESPN's Match-up Predictor gives Cincinnati a 51.7% chance of winning.
Posted 03 October 2022 - 10:52 AM
There is baseball, and occasionally there are other things of note
"Now OPS sucks. Got it."
"Making his own olive brine is peak Mackus."
"I'm too hungover to watch a loss." - McNulty
@bopper33
Posted 03 October 2022 - 11:34 AM
Posted 03 October 2022 - 12:44 PM
They'll probably find a way to win this one.
Posted 03 October 2022 - 12:46 PM
I get to go to this one!
Posted 03 October 2022 - 12:48 PM
Posted 03 October 2022 - 12:51 PM
Going to come down to which OLine shows up for Cinci this week. The one that was just awful weeks 1-3, or the week 4 iteration which kept Burrow clean, only giving up 1 sack to an aggressive Dolphins team on a Thursday night. They looked to click last week, but it’s only one week. Point being, if we give Burrow time (and a lot of times even if we don’t), he’ll light it up.
I agree, this team overall is good. They’ll be ready. If it’s a blowout like last year, that’ll say a lot though.
Posted 03 October 2022 - 12:55 PM
Posted 03 October 2022 - 01:02 PM
The Cincinnati Oline is poor, and the best way to beat them would be with a Front 4 that could get pass rush without scheme.
The Ravens can't do that. And even if you bring extra rushers and try and scheme; their ability to get home is in-doubt.
If you go 3-3-5, or 3-2-6 without pressure; Burrow will probably pick you apart.... but I think that's probably the best way to go. Make Burrow work up and down the field. Keep the Bengals in-front of you.
Tighten up in the RZ, and try and force a turnover or two.
Posted 03 October 2022 - 01:03 PM
Posted 03 October 2022 - 01:03 PM
Long sustained drives finishing in TD’s.
If they have the opportunity for points, I hope they take them.
Generally agree though. Sustained drives, and finish.
Posted 03 October 2022 - 01:05 PM
They added to the Oline and it’s a group learning to play together. Same argument you’re trying to sell on our defense, except for the fact that Cinc’s OLine looked great last week.
Interesting. Do see Burrow is crediting their play in the win vs. Miami.
Just knew they had allowed 15 sacks going into that game.
Posted 03 October 2022 - 01:08 PM
I still think they are vulnerable, just wouldn’t surprise me if they play well either. And Burrow is just so hard to stop when he has a pocket.
Interesting. Do see Burrow is crediting their play in the win vs. Miami.
Just knew they had allowed 15 sacks going into that game.
Posted 03 October 2022 - 02:27 PM
Posted 03 October 2022 - 04:23 PM
Burrow's Cincinnati owns the Ravens. I don't see that changing in a year with one of the worst Ravens defenses in recent memory.
Posted 03 October 2022 - 04:31 PM
Posted 03 October 2022 - 04:34 PM
I have no idea what to expect and think literally everything is reasonably possible. Blowout win to blowout loss and everything in between.
Blowout either way would be pretty surprising. But overall yeah, I dont want anyone saying they know how this game will go
Posted 03 October 2022 - 04:34 PM
Joe Burrow is 2-1 against the Ravens. That's hardly owning someone. In a best-of-five, it's not even a series win.
Yes, there was that second-half shellacking by the Bengals in the first game last year, but in the second meeting, Burrow's counterpart was Josh Johnson, who has played for just about every NFL team but the Pottsville Maroons.
Posted 03 October 2022 - 04:36 PM
Joe Burrow is 2-1 against the Ravens. That's hardly owning someone. In a best-of-five, it's not even a series win.
Yes, there was that second-half shellacking by the Bengals in the first game last year, but in the second meeting, Burrow's counterpart was Josh Johnson, who has played for just about every NFL team but the Pottsville Maroons.
Consider the source.
Posted 03 October 2022 - 04:39 PM
Less likely than a close game, didn't mean to imply a blowout was equally likely as close. Just that I can envision what feels like a reasonable path to any of the options.Blowout either way would be pretty surprising. But overall yeah, I dont want anyone saying they know how this game will go
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users