
Cade Povich
#1
Posted 13 August 2022 - 05:40 PM
#2
Posted 13 August 2022 - 08:00 PM
He's been pretty electric so far. 2 GS, 12 innings, 15 Ks to 2 BBs, no runs allowed.
Bowie is calling
#3
Posted 15 August 2022 - 12:00 PM
Promoted to AA Bowie.
#4
Posted 15 August 2022 - 12:18 PM
Excited to see what he can do at Bowie. Hard to do any better than he did in his two A+ starts here.
#5
Posted 22 August 2022 - 01:18 AM
His Bowie debut was pretty successful. 5 IP, 2 ER, 6 K 2 BB.
#6
Posted 22 August 2022 - 07:17 AM
Teens in our system is about where everyone here discussed him as being. It's a pick-em between he and Rom, IMO. If Povich's velocity increase is true and sustainable, he edges ahead. A big final two months can of course change a lot, so if he pitches really well while here (especially after moving up to Bowie) then that moves him up in a way that he wouldn't have been regarded at the time of the trade.
#7
Posted 22 August 2022 - 07:30 AM
Teens in our system is about where everyone here discussed him as being. It's a pick-em between he and Rom, IMO. If Povich's velocity increase is true and sustainable, he edges ahead. A big final two months can of course change a lot, so if he pitches really well while here (especially after moving up to Bowie) then that moves him up in a way that he wouldn't have been regarded at the time of the trade.
Wouldn't have been regarded from our perspective as outsiders. Its pretty clear he had helium at the time of the trade
- makoman likes this
#8
Posted 22 August 2022 - 08:13 AM
Wouldn't have been regarded from our perspective as outsiders. Its pretty clear he had helium at the time of the trade
-Ok I'll buy that. But I won't ever agree that he was enough to be the bulk of the return for Lopez considering the importance of the final months of this season and the two more years of control. He'd need to be ahead of Stowers and Westburg for that and he just isn't.
- Mike B likes this
#9
Posted 22 August 2022 - 08:17 AM
-Ok I'll buy that. But I won't ever agree that he was enough to be the bulk of the return for Lopez considering the importance of the final months of this season and the two more years of control. He'd need to be ahead of Stowers and Westburg for that and he just isn't.
I dont know that I disagree unless there is helium in one of the other guys we got back. I did prefer to keep the high leverage guys in our BP intact.
#10
Posted 22 August 2022 - 04:07 PM
I am not trying to rehash the trades again, we have beat them to death, but I think Elias even tried to sell the return he got for Jorge to the fan base. He referred to Povich as a potential TOR guy.. I guess you can label a lot of prospects that way, but it does not feel like anyone else feels that way.
#11
Posted 23 August 2022 - 04:17 AM
I am not trying to rehash the trades again, we have beat them to death, but I think Elias even tried to sell the return he got for Jorge to the fan base. He referred to Povich as a potential TOR guy.. I guess you can label a lot of prospects that way, but it does not feel like anyone else feels that way.
I think you have to read between the lines a bit when listening to the smoke that Elias was blowing. The impression I got from Elias was that he figured Povich as someone who had a good chance of being a #2/3 starter on a playoff team, with an outside shot at being the best starter on said team. That certainly didn't jive with the prospect reports at the time, which largely didn't account for his increased velocity or his 12 K/9 and 4:1 K/BB ratio.
-Ok I'll buy that. But I won't ever agree that he was enough to be the bulk of the return for Lopez considering the importance of the final months of this season and the two more years of control. He'd need to be ahead of Stowers and Westburg for that and he just isn't.
I'm with you here - I'm still mildly against this trade. But Stowers is currently ranked 9 on MLB's prospect list and there's an outside shot that with a good showing in Bowie he could end up in that ballpark.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users