**Proceeds to ignore his actual numbers the past 1.5 months and construct some weird alternative history based on what he did in Fenway in 2019 and Brandon Hyde's clear ability to will his players to hit well**
I think baseball players have lots of ups and downs over 162 games. It's silly to ignore a quarter of the season and pretend they just would have been far better because he was hot in May. Especially when that doesn't explain July.
No, I think because he's batting .202 since the trade, that doesn't mean he'd be batting .202 the last 7 weeks if he was still here. That's what the simpleton Elias apologists think.
If he was playing left field in Houston (Which he does sometimes, for those of you that think he's a worse, easily replaceable David Ortiz) and crashed into the wall and broke his wrist, it doesn't mean he would have suffered a broken wrist here. Why? He is playing under a completely different set of circumstances now than he was. The circumstances from a hitting standpoint, IMO, are more likely to lead to his decreased offensive output in all categories except HRs, which are up.
Notice how I'm not arguing that he'd have hit 8 home runs since the trade if he'd still been here? Like a simpleton Elias apologist would have to with their logic that what he's doing there equals what he'd have done here.
Variables people! This nonsense started the first day he was gone. He hit a homer and everyone said "would have been a fly out at Camden Yards." Well, the O's were playing in Texas that day, so that's a dumb statement to make, ignoring all other variables.