I actually find this thread amusing. Mainly because I was a contributor to the Sun Paper's forum at that time, and was being nailed for some of my comments that weren't quite all in purple.
So why do you think the QB play was so bad back then?
People in the forum were all about "In Ozzy we trust". Along about 2006 I started questioning that and got totally flamed. I wasn't saying that the Ravens organization was bad, but I was questioning those who said it was the best in the NFL.
My point was that for as well as the Raven's drafted, there was a real problem with QBs and WRs. No doubt the draft picks for defense were incredible. But if you want to be the best in the game, you need to come up with a good QB and maybe a good WR at some point.
The Ravens D from about 2000 to 2008 was worthy of getting multiple rings the way the Steel Curtain of the 70's did. The reason they didn't was because the front office couldn't figure out what to do at the positions of QB and WR. The Ravens could easily have been there with the Patriots and Colts in the 2000's......if they only could figure out what to do on the offensive side of the ball. So whose fault was that? The front office. They wasted years of having the best MLB to play the game, and the best FS to play the game....because they couldn't draft a QB or a WR that could make a difference.