I'll check it out. I've dug in quite a bit on this. Needless to say, the saying applies to our government just as it does to individuals "people show you who they are if you're paying attention." I can't wrap my head around people's willingness to accept stuff like this. Is it a hierarchy of needs thing? So long as your safe, comfortable and not hungry, you're good? Or they see not accepting this from our government as a threat to that security and comfort? I don't have that gene. It just drives me crazy that this is the world we live in and no one cares.
If you want other great material on JFK, here are some others...."Crossfire, The Plot That Killed Kennedy" by Jim Marrs (which was used as the source material for Oliver Stone's "JFK"), "Bloody Treason" by Noel Twyman (this is difficult to find in print but you can get it on the Kindle; delves into a likely Zapruder film tampering in an attempt to obfuscate that the limo driver, Special Agent Greer, pulled the car to the right and to almost a complete stop right before the fatal shot), "Best Evidence" by David Lifton (this covers all of the medical evidence and uncovers obvious forgery of the evidence and autopsy photos and other outright lies). Another good one is "Hit List" by Richard Belzer, which covers all of the bizarre circumstances surrounding the many deaths of key witnesses and others that may have knowledge of the assassination. It also analyzes the statistical improbabilities of that many people from the same subset all dying suddenly of things like single vehicle accidents, sudden heart attacks and even a karate chop to the neck.
When you realize the true gravity of what happened on 11/22/63, the state of our country and the rest of the world comes into sharper focus.
Our president was murdered in broad daylight on the streets of a major American city and a "blue ribbon" commission came to the conclusion that a "disgruntled ex marine" with a cheap Manlicher Carcano rifle (which had a defective sight, even the WC acknowledged this and was nicknamed the "Humane Weapon" because soldiers said it never killed anyone), stood in a 6th floor window and through a Texas Live Oak tree, which was in full bloom, fired 3 shots in 5.7 seconds from a weapon that needed at least 2.3 seconds between shots to recycle the spent cartridge and load the new one, at a target moving away and scored 2 hits, with the 3rd shot being the most accurate. And Oswald was a terrible shot, as per his marine marksmen test, he passed a paraffin test for gun shot residue and no useable prints were found on the weapon.
I could go on but the bottom line is that enough people swallowed that lie, so the lies have gotten bigger and more frequent. Then, they killed King, X, Fred Hampton, RFK, etc and killed the movement as a result.
