So based on how the season went, you can gamble against the bad teams.they did it last year and then tried against a good team and failed. How did the questionable decision making work this year versus the teams that they lost to?
You're questioning the decision based on the results and to me that's flawed logic.
As far as going for it against only bad teams; we were 1 for 2 vs KC, 1 for 1 vs Seattle, 1 for 1 vs NE, 1 for 1 vs LAR, 1 for 2 vs SF....all pretty good teams last year.
We can agree to disagree but I like being aggressive and fully support the Tecmo Bowl mentality.
With regards to this year and their losses, there were many issues besides going for it on 4th down. Turnovers, inconsistent offensive line play due to injuries and shuffling guys and in out to find the right combo, etc.