Politics
#2
Posted 02 March 2020 - 12:51 PM
For me, specifically? Not concerned at all. For my extended family/friends? Slight concern. Nothing more.
But in the realm of people that (and I think it's been mentioned here) do not have insurance, and will absolutely refuse to foot that bill to get checked (whether it's due to paranoia or not)...you're just making things a ton worse for the rest of us.
I mean, maybe these check-ups should all be free? IJS.
Super Tuesday is tomorrow - hopefully people vote accordingly.
- Adam Wolff likes this
#3
Posted 02 March 2020 - 02:58 PM
Super Tuesday is tomorrow - hopefully people vote accordingly.
See I was trying to say that without crossing the line, ya jerk.
- You Play to Win the Game likes this
#4
Posted 02 March 2020 - 03:13 PM
I figured, with how obvious it was set up. You KNOW I can't help myself.
See I was trying to say that without crossing the line, ya jerk.
- The Epic likes this
#5
Posted 02 March 2020 - 03:40 PM
(Sorry I couldn’t help myself either)
#6
Posted 02 March 2020 - 07:17 PM
You guys apparently don’t know what free means.
(Sorry I couldn’t help myself either)
I'll settle for free-ish.
#7
Posted 10 March 2020 - 10:05 PM
- You Play to Win the Game and Mike in STL like this
There is baseball, and occasionally there are other things of note
"Now OPS sucks. Got it."
"Making his own olive brine is peak Mackus."
"I'm too hungover to watch a loss." - McNulty
@bopper33
#8
Posted 10 March 2020 - 10:28 PM
Cancel elections in heavily populated areas for the 2020 November election (mail in only) and watch how quickly people speak up about how unnecessary it is.
We can quickly pivot to mail in ballots like Oregon does.
https://www.nytimes....ing-delays.html
@fuzydunlop
#9
Posted 10 March 2020 - 10:43 PM
We can quickly pivot to mail in ballots like Oregon does.
https://www.nytimes....ing-delays.html
So you’re ok if a state like, say, Ohio decides to limit ballots in heavily populated (read: urban) areas?
There is baseball, and occasionally there are other things of note
"Now OPS sucks. Got it."
"Making his own olive brine is peak Mackus."
"I'm too hungover to watch a loss." - McNulty
@bopper33
#10
Posted 10 March 2020 - 10:45 PM
I already answered you.
@fuzydunlop
#11
Posted 12 March 2020 - 08:51 AM
This is something that should happen. Contain it, and be smart. But there's a TON of going overboard here IMO. And CNN is absolutely shredding Trump this morning for not being more detailed in his address last night. Not helping. And I hate to have to defend Trump, I can't stand the guy.
We're here largely because of Trump's inaction and refusal to believe this should be taken seriously. We had two months of a head-start to deal with it and now we're playing catch up.
#12
Posted 12 March 2020 - 08:53 AM
We're here largely because of Trump's inaction and refusal to believe this should be taken seriously. We had two months of a head-start to deal with it and now we're playing catch up.
There is zero he(or anyone) could have done to prevent this from coming here.
#13
Posted 12 March 2020 - 08:54 AM
We're here largely because of Trump's inaction and refusal to believe this should be taken seriously. We had two months of a head-start to deal with it and now we're playing catch up.
Oh I agree - I think this ultimately costs him the election. I really do. But that's different than spending an entire morning tearing him apart because he didn't read off a multi-page travel ban including every finite point in an oval office address that was more about a general message of this is what we're doing.
#14
Posted 12 March 2020 - 08:54 AM
This is something that should happen. Contain it, and be smart. But there's a TON of going overboard here IMO. And CNN is absolutely shredding Trump this morning for not being more detailed in his address last night. Not helping. And I hate to have to defend Trump, I can't stand the guy.
The administration is already walking back multiple things from the address that range from exaggerated to untrue.
That this is the case is a major part of why we are in the mess.
#15
Posted 12 March 2020 - 08:54 AM
Oh I agree - I think this ultimately costs him the election. I really do. But that's different than spending an entire morning tearing him apart because he didn't read off a multi-page travel ban including every finite point in an oval office address that was more about a general message of this is what we're doing.
He hasn't earned that benefit of the doubt.
#16
Posted 12 March 2020 - 08:55 AM
There is zero he(or anyone) could have done to prevent this from coming here.
He could've banned travel or contained travel much more aggressively, and should've. But doing so would've signaled to the markets a sense of panic and hurt the economy. But by reacting instead of being proactive, the market/economy is hurting even more than it would've. To me, my read on this is Trump views this as an annoyance rather than something that should be taken very seriously (until now, basically).
#17
Posted 12 March 2020 - 08:55 AM
There is zero he(or anyone) could have done to prevent this from coming here.
He's done a poor job getting in front of it.
#18
Posted 12 March 2020 - 08:56 AM
He hasn't earned that benefit of the doubt.
It's completely unnecessary. He's now doing things that should've been done a long time ago. Many Americans are scared, CNN won't miss this opportunity to completely bury him though.
#19
Posted 12 March 2020 - 08:57 AM
His reaction was the same as yours and mine.He could've banned travel or contained travel much more aggressively, and should've. But doing so would've signaled to the markets a sense of panic and hurt the economy. But by reacting instead of being proactive, the market/economy is hurting even more than it would've. To me, my read on this is Trump views this as an annoyance rather than something that should be taken very seriously (until now, basically).
This isn’t that big of a deal to halt everything, cause money losses, etc...
Btw, I’m not defending him. He could have done better. I’m just saying, no matter what he did, it would have made its way into the country. There is no way that this wasn’t going to become an issue in this country.
People just think throwing money at the problem solves things and that’s just not true.
#20
Posted 12 March 2020 - 08:58 AM
His reaction was the same as yours and mine.
This isn’t that big of a deal to halt everything, cause money losses, etc...
Btw, I’m not defending him. He could have done better. I’m just saying, no matter what he did, it would have made its way into the country.
People just think throwing money at the problem solves things and that’s just not true.
We don't have access to leading scientists, doctors and pandemic experts like he does though. It's excusable for regular Joe's (well, you're regular, me, not so much) to choose not to buy into it all that much, but it isn't for our President not to. But tearing him apart for last night seems vicious to me.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users