MASN: After latest run-scoring hit, is Yusniel Diaz pushing for a roster spot?
http://www.masnsport...oster-spot.html
Posted 07 March 2019 - 12:53 PM
MASN: After latest run-scoring hit, is Yusniel Diaz pushing for a roster spot?
http://www.masnsport...oster-spot.html
Posted 07 March 2019 - 01:55 PM
The O's pretty much have to play the service time game with Diaz, though, don't they?
Posted 07 March 2019 - 02:09 PM
The O's pretty much have to play the service time game with Diaz, though, don't they?
They would be idiots not to.
Posted 08 March 2019 - 09:24 AM
The O's pretty much have to play the service time game with Diaz, though, don't they?
He needs to "work on his defense" a bit.
Posted 08 March 2019 - 09:33 AM
He was in A+ last July. Sending him down won't have any controversy and considering him on the MLB roster to begin the year would be a horrible idea. This isn't like Vald Jr where he made it to AAA (and killed it) last season and is pretty obviously being sent down solely for service time reasons. There is no reasonable argument that can be made that Diaz has nothing left to prove in the minors. He's had 2 ok months at AA. He's got a lot of work left to do before you can say he's beating down the door. A strong spring is completely meaningless, IMO.
Posted 24 March 2019 - 04:01 PM
BSL: https://www.baltimor...ring-2019-10-1/
(#1) Yusniel Diaz, OF
Ceiling: 55 Risk: High ETA: 2019 Role Description: Above-Average Player
Ht/Wt: 6’1” / 195 lbs. B/T: R/R Highest Level: AA Age (as of April 1, 2019): 22y, 5m
Video #1 | Video #2 | Spotlight
Diaz was the main prospect returned by the Orioles last summer for Manny Machado. He got off to a fast start in the Texas League and starred in the Futures Game before the trade, struggling down the stretch once he reached Baltimore’s Double-A affiliate. If he can refine an over-aggressive approach and find more consistency at the plate while sticking in CF, Diaz has the upside of an above-average regular. Defensively, he’s capable of playing an average CF but isn’t a slam dunk to remain at the position. A move down the defensive spectrum would likely mean Diaz tops out a FV 50 type, but we see him as a player destined to play a long time in the big leagues either way.
Posted 29 March 2019 - 06:33 PM
Starting at AA Bowie.
Posted 15 April 2019 - 12:49 PM
AA: .222/.317/.444 (.762), 3 doubles, 1 triple, 1 HR, 4 RBI, 36 AB
Posted 04 May 2019 - 11:09 AM
71 ab's, .225 / .313 / .338 (.651)
Rough 20 games to start the year. Let's see what the next 60 games look like.
Posted 04 May 2019 - 04:56 PM
Posted 05 May 2019 - 12:05 PM
Posted 05 May 2019 - 12:27 PM
Starting to look like Villar will be the most productive player we got back from the trades last year. Everyone else we got will be hard pressed to produce more than him. Depressing.
Posted 05 May 2019 - 12:29 PM
Starting to look like Villar will be the most productive player we got back from the trades last year. Everyone else we got will be hard pressed to produce more than him. Depressing.
Posted 05 May 2019 - 12:59 PM
I’m not giving up on Diaz after one poor month when maybe he was trying to play through a nagging injury.
Most wouldn't.
Posted 05 May 2019 - 01:44 PM
Posted 05 May 2019 - 01:52 PM
There is baseball, and occasionally there are other things of note
"Now OPS sucks. Got it."
"Making his own olive brine is peak Mackus."
"I'm too hungover to watch a loss." - McNulty
@bopper33
Posted 29 May 2019 - 04:07 PM
Posted 29 May 2019 - 09:25 PM
Posted 30 May 2019 - 11:27 AM
Activated from the IL, sent to A+ Frederick for what I assume is a brief rehab stint.
The new regime seems to like to start a player's rehab at a lower level.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |