BSLSeanJester, on 28 May 2018 - 19:51, said:
Here’s the thing. Even if the county and state do the work that needs to be done to prevent this flooding from happening again, how do you convince people that it’s fixed? How do you convince people to invest their lives in a place that flooded this bad twice in less than two years? Especially if what I’m hearing is true and that a lot of places downtown were uninsurable?
People have notoriously short memories about places they want to be... even after major freaking hurricanes knock everything over, people rebuild in exactly the same spot...
If they fix it, buyers will come... and even if they don't fix a damn thing, a lot of buyers will still come, just as soon as they can forget what they don't want to remember...
(BTW, in response to earlier posts which feature the obligatory dissing of gov't, not only is gov't quite capable of taking corrective measures, but it's also uniquely capable... it's the only force in society that can do something like that... the problem isn't the nature of gov't, the problem is that everybody has decided taxes are a bad thing, nobody wants to pay them, so lots of things that matter to lots of people have been completely ignored... as the engineering societies routinely report, the entire nation has had basically no maintenance for 30+ years... however, we are leading the world in tax cuts...
Disclaimer: I'm not familiar with the details of local gov't's role in this... am not saying the local decision makers are innocent of negligence, maybe they are, maybe they're not, I know zilch about them... am just saying that even diligent officials who aren't bought cannot fix things without the money to do it with...)