Can't read the article, but hard to agree with the title when he's not gonna pitch enough innings to qualify. If he had a 2-something ERA over that few number of innings, maybe.
Apparently I haven't read the Sun much lately, because I could read it.
1) there's a setup to kick off that leaves the door open to trade and indicator of 'intent' for the offseason.
2) the article is basing it off a floor of 140 innings and 'this century', so the Orioles pitching class since 2000 is fairly limited. If you want to build different parameters, you could probably not include him...but the standards right now would be pretty thin.
3) I was actually surprised he has 25 starts when I looked at it. Seems like he was out forever...struggled when he came back....but last 2 starts of AUG and all of SEP (so seven starts) were good.
This season is an example of why we should avoid early labels for players. Means has certainly pitched really well at times, but the bigger labels aren't a per start basis. I'd like to see him pitch more consistently deeper into games (more 6+ versus 5+ IP/Start) and missing a few more bats would be good, but his ERA, K:BB and overall performance certainly have the makings of reliable quality.